Skip to content

Conversation

@schloerke
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #350

Missed method in #346 . Discovered from #162 top comment

@schloerke schloerke self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
2131 1982 93% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

File Coverage Status
src/posit/connect/tags.py 96% 🟢
TOTAL 96% 🟢

updated for commit: 62d6b37 by action🐍

@schloerke schloerke marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 18:18
@schloerke schloerke requested a review from tdstein as a code owner December 9, 2024 18:18
@schloerke schloerke added enhancement New feature or request sdk Used for automation labels Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@tdstein tdstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for rearranging the conditional logic!

@schloerke schloerke merged commit e8392e0 into main Dec 9, 2024
35 checks passed
@schloerke schloerke deleted the schloerke/tag-delete branch December 9, 2024 21:45
@tdstein tdstein mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request sdk Used for automation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: Add tag.update() support

3 participants