Benchmark: TurboByte+TurboBitByte vs streamvbtyte #96
Description
TurboBitByte (=TurboByte+TurboPack) compress considerably better and can be more than 3 times faster than streamvbyte.
icapp ZIPF -I15 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130 zipf alpha=1.50 range[0..255].n=1000000 E MB/s size ratio D MB/s function integer size=32 bits 27832 998869 24.97% 61563 50:v8nenc128v32 TurboBitByte 50693 1003267 25.08% 86389 55:v8nenc256v32 TurboBitByte 22740 1250000 31.25% 33114 45:v8enc32 TurboByte SIMD 20622 1250000 31.25% 33616 130:streamvbyte StreamVByte SIMD icapp ZIPF -I15 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130 -M100m zipf alpha=1.50 range[0..104857600].n=1000000 17707 1301157 32.53% 33095 45:v8enc32 TurboByte SIMD 13432 1301157 32.53% 33065 130:streamvbyte StreamVByte SIMD 13164 1305035 32.63% 30378 55:v8nenc256v32 TurboBitByte 11348 1305997 32.65% 27898 50:v8nenc128v32 TurboBitByte icapp lz77offset.u32.u32 -I16 -J15 -v0 -e45,55,130 12085 23992643 51.42% 12928 55:v8nenc256v32 TurboBitByte 11617 24287565 52.05% 13023 45:v8enc32 TurboBitByte 10607 24287565 52.05% 12857 130:streamvbyte StreamVByte SIMD icapp lz77length.txt -Fc -I16 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130 19006 29011087 17.52% 13987 50:v8nenc128v32 TurboBitByte 17199 30265912 18.28% 13372 55:v8nenc256v32 TurboBitByte 12624 51783739 31.27% 13419 45:v8enc32 TurboByte SIMD 11206 51783739 31.27% 13563 130:streamvbyte StreamVByte SIMD icapp lz77length.txt -Fc -I16 -J15 -e49,51,56,132 10733 33467195 20.21% 11283 51:v8nzenc128v32 TurboBitByte zigzag 12947 34771338 21.00% 11736 56:v8nzenc256v32 TurboBitByte zigzag 12232 51893881 31.34% 12566 49:v8zenc32 TurboByte zigzag 3988 51893881 31.34% 4694 132:streamvbyte zzag StreamVByte zigzag