Update Discourse data data [skip ci]

Author: precice-bot

assets/data/faq.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
-  "generated_at": "2025-12-04T06:27:49.030042",
+  "generated_at": "2025-12-05T06:27:59.487372",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 27,
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/3d-1d-coupling/388",
       "created_at": "2020-11-13T07:39:48.596Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2020-11-16T08:51:56.471Z",
-      "views": 1668,
+      "views": 1669,
       "posts_count": 4,
       "like_count": 1,
       "excerpt": "Hi!\nis there a way to couple a 1D simulation (OpenModelica) with a 3D simulation (OpenFoam)?\nthx"
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-one-way-coupling/28",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T20:58:29.741Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2020-04-27T11:07:12.123Z",
-      "views": 2644,
+      "views": 2645,
       "posts_count": 5,
       "like_count": 0,
       "excerpt": "Can I couple two participants one-way?"
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
       "views": 502,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Or: Can preCICE interpolate between an arbitrary / unstructured mesh and a regular / structured mesh?"
     },
     {
       "id": 55,
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
       "views": 467,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
     },
     {
       "id": 54,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
       "views": 508,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
       "views": 511,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
     },
     {
       "id": 26,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
       "views": 579,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
     },
     {
       "id": 50,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
       "views": 833,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
     },
     {
       "id": 43,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
       "views": 1003,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 29,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
       "views": 810,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
       "views": 1116,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
     },
     {
       "id": 44,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
       "views": 1487,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Alex started a good discussion on the mailing list (May 3, 2019) about best practices when writing a new adapter:\nI wanted to ask if there are some additional guidelines on how to write good adapters for preCICE. I have the feeling that I might think\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 42,
@@ -333,10 +333,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-does-precice-handle-data-mapping-for-non-matching-domain-decompositions/42",
       "created_at": "2019-10-10T19:28:48.005Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-10T19:40:04.456Z",
-      "views": 721,
+      "views": 723,
       "posts_count": 7,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
       "views": 739,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 2,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
       "views": 639,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
     }
   ]
 }

assets/data/news.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generated_at": "2025-12-04T06:27:46.021050",
+  "generated_at": "2025-12-05T06:27:50.525246",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 2678,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-12-01T13:41:03.261Z",
       "like_count": 0,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 13,
+      "views": 14,
       "description": "Besides the preCICE Workshops (with the next one expected in March 2027), we regularly organize preCICE sessions in larger conferences. The WCCM 2026 conference will take place in Munich, Germany,..."
     },
     {
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-11-04T12:39:39.274Z",
       "like_count": 5,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 81,
+      "views": 83,
       "description": "Imagine a full week of learning as much as possible about coupling simulations and having all the people you need to talk to in the same room. That\u2019s exactly how..."
     },
     {
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-10-09T15:52:04.962Z",
       "like_count": 5,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 234,
+      "views": 235,
       "description": "Summary: With preCICE v3.3.0, we focused on improving clarity, portability, and tooling. The new release brings clearer coupling-state output and more helpful error messages. Tooling has been reworked significantly and..."
     },
     {
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-05-06T06:24:30.728Z",
       "like_count": 8,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 121,
+      "views": 122,
       "description": "Dear preCICE community, We are happy to share the final publication of our research article titled \u201cEfficient Partition-of-Unity Radial-Basis-Function Interpolation for Coupled Problems\u201d in the SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing...."
     },
     {
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-04-02T13:17:09.876Z",
       "like_count": 3,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 201,
+      "views": 202,
       "description": "Summary: Important long-term features see great progress with the new release preCICE release v3.2, such as different options to handle dynamic meshes. Other features were finally wrapped up and integrated,..."
     },
     {
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2024-02-27T09:42:45.629Z",
       "like_count": 8,
       "posts_count": 4,
-      "views": 1009,
+      "views": 1010,
       "description": "The longer you wait for something, the more you appreciate it, right? preCICE v3 is finally out and we are pretty happy about it. v3.0.0 is a breaking release. This..."
     },
     {
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2022-08-11T10:25:59.059Z",
       "like_count": 7,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 1337,
+      "views": 1338,
       "description": "Iceberg ahead \u2026 we will be breaking soon . Breaking means we will go to v3.0 and improve the API and configuration. Many things have piled up and it is..."
     },
     {