Update Discourse data data [skip ci]

Author: precice-bot

assets/data/faq.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
-  "generated_at": "2025-11-05T06:25:25.809850",
+  "generated_at": "2025-11-06T06:25:46.529174",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 27,
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-is-precice-funded/51",
       "created_at": "2019-10-14T12:25:40.285Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:27:31.952Z",
-      "views": 567,
+      "views": 568,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
       "excerpt": "Is preCICE indeed free software, or is it too good to be true?"
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
       "views": 466,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
     },
     {
       "id": 54,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
       "views": 506,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
       "views": 509,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
     },
     {
       "id": 26,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
       "views": 572,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
     },
     {
       "id": 50,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
       "views": 829,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
     },
     {
       "id": 43,
@@ -285,10 +285,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-can-precice-interpolate-between-different-timestep-sizes/43",
       "created_at": "2019-10-10T20:13:00.568Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-13T18:53:06.468Z",
-      "views": 996,
+      "views": 997,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 29,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
       "views": 809,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
       "views": 1106,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
     },
     {
       "id": 44,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
       "views": 1484,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Alex started a good discussion on the mailing list (May 3, 2019) about best practices when writing a new adapter:\nI wanted to ask if there are some additional guidelines on how to write good adapters for preCICE. I have the feeling that I might think\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
       "views": 716,
       "posts_count": 7,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
       "views": 737,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 2,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
       "views": 634,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
     }
   ]
 }

assets/data/news.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generated_at": "2025-11-05T06:25:22.950384",
+  "generated_at": "2025-11-06T06:25:39.786430",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 217,
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
       "slug": "looking-back-at-the-precice-workshop-2025",
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/looking-back-at-the-precice-workshop-2025/2658",
       "last_posted_at": "2025-11-04T12:39:39.274Z",
-      "like_count": 3,
+      "like_count": 4,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 16,
+      "views": 23,
       "description": "Imagine a full week of learning as much as possible about coupling simulations and having all the people you need to talk to in the same room. That\u2019s exactly how..."
     },
     {
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-10-22T10:52:31.506Z",
       "like_count": 6,
       "posts_count": 4,
-      "views": 148,
+      "views": 156,
       "description": "Dear preCICE community, Some of you are already experimenting with just\u2011in\u2011time data mapping and other features introduced in preCICE v3.2. In my recently completed thesis, Flexible mesh\u2011particle coupling with preCICE,..."
     },
     {
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-10-09T15:52:04.962Z",
       "like_count": 4,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 188,
+      "views": 202,
       "description": "Summary: With preCICE v3.3.0, we focused on improving clarity, portability, and tooling. The new release brings clearer coupling-state output and more helpful error messages. Tooling has been reworked significantly and..."
     },
     {
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-07-15T07:42:25.142Z",
       "like_count": 3,
       "posts_count": 8,
-      "views": 144,
+      "views": 145,
       "description": "The preCICE Workshop 2025 will take place at HSU Hamburg on 8th to 12th of September. The workshop will include an introduction course and is, thus, suitable for new and..."
     },
     {
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-05-06T06:24:30.728Z",
       "like_count": 8,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 111,
+      "views": 112,
       "description": "Dear preCICE community, We are happy to share the final publication of our research article titled \u201cEfficient Partition-of-Unity Radial-Basis-Function Interpolation for Coupled Problems\u201d in the SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing...."
     },
     {
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-05-06T13:04:14.618Z",
       "like_count": 1,
       "posts_count": 5,
-      "views": 167,
+      "views": 168,
       "description": "The ECCOMAS Coupled Problems 2025 will take place on Sardinia, Italy from May 26 to 29, 2025. We are again organizing a preCICE minisymposium: Multi-Physics and Multi-Scale Simulations with the..."
     },
     {