Skip to content

Commit 886a780

Browse files
committed
Update Discourse data data [skip ci]
1 parent 2bad025 commit 886a780

File tree

2 files changed

+24
-24
lines changed

2 files changed

+24
-24
lines changed

assets/data/faq.json

Lines changed: 20 additions & 20 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
{
22
"source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
3-
"generated_at": "2025-11-21T06:26:41.721608",
3+
"generated_at": "2025-11-22T06:22:54.048136",
44
"topics": [
55
{
66
"id": 27,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
99
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27",
1010
"created_at": "2019-09-23T20:55:55.190Z",
1111
"last_posted_at": "2025-08-11T13:12:45.035Z",
12-
"views": 3230,
12+
"views": 3231,
1313
"posts_count": 9,
1414
"like_count": 2,
1515
"excerpt": "I read that you do surface coupling?\nDo you support volume coupling too?"
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
2121
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/restarting-coupled-fsi-simulation-with-precice/117",
2222
"created_at": "2019-12-06T09:10:16.329Z",
2323
"last_posted_at": "2024-07-03T15:56:51.883Z",
24-
"views": 2286,
24+
"views": 2287,
2525
"posts_count": 11,
2626
"like_count": 5,
2727
"excerpt": "Dear all,\nI am trying to validate my fluid and structure mesh for the FSI1 case of cylinder-flap test. As the refinement of the fluid and structure mesh increases, it is difficult for implicit FSI coupling to converge. Therefore, my idea is to use a \u2026"
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
105105
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-to-debug-the-openfoam-adapter/815",
106106
"created_at": "2021-12-02T14:38:34.182Z",
107107
"last_posted_at": "2021-12-08T17:37:49.386Z",
108-
"views": 1249,
108+
"views": 1250,
109109
"posts_count": 7,
110110
"like_count": 6,
111111
"excerpt": "Hello preCICE community,\nI am opening this topic in the hopes of following:\n\nIt works as guidance for future developers working on OF adapters\nGetting help on debugging OpenFOAM adapter or OF related things\n\n\nMy System:\nKubuntu 20.04 LTS\npreCICE v2.3\u2026"
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
117117
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-can-i-restart-a-coupled-simulation/675",
118118
"created_at": "2021-07-29T13:29:19.539Z",
119119
"last_posted_at": "2021-07-29T13:31:08.839Z",
120-
"views": 1464,
120+
"views": 1465,
121121
"posts_count": 3,
122122
"like_count": 3,
123123
"excerpt": "Common question: \u201cMy simulation crashed after hours of running, but my solvers already has stored restart files. Do I need to do anything special in preCICE?\u201d"
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
201201
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-is-precice-funded/51",
202202
"created_at": "2019-10-14T12:25:40.285Z",
203203
"last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:27:31.952Z",
204-
"views": 574,
204+
"views": 575,
205205
"posts_count": 2,
206206
"like_count": 0,
207207
"excerpt": "Is preCICE indeed free software, or is it too good to be true?"
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
228228
"views": 466,
229229
"posts_count": 2,
230230
"like_count": 0,
231-
"excerpt": ""
231+
"excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
232232
},
233233
{
234234
"id": 54,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
240240
"views": 507,
241241
"posts_count": 2,
242242
"like_count": 0,
243-
"excerpt": ""
243+
"excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
244244
},
245245
{
246246
"id": 52,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
252252
"views": 511,
253253
"posts_count": 2,
254254
"like_count": 0,
255-
"excerpt": ""
255+
"excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
256256
},
257257
{
258258
"id": 26,
@@ -261,10 +261,10 @@
261261
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/do-you-test-precice/26",
262262
"created_at": "2019-09-23T20:54:58.538Z",
263263
"last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:18:09.436Z",
264-
"views": 577,
264+
"views": 578,
265265
"posts_count": 2,
266266
"like_count": 0,
267-
"excerpt": ""
267+
"excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
268268
},
269269
{
270270
"id": 50,
@@ -273,10 +273,10 @@
273273
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/which-openfoam-versions-are-supported/50",
274274
"created_at": "2019-10-13T19:13:05.736Z",
275275
"last_posted_at": "2019-10-13T19:19:48.194Z",
276-
"views": 832,
276+
"views": 833,
277277
"posts_count": 2,
278278
"like_count": 0,
279-
"excerpt": ""
279+
"excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
280280
},
281281
{
282282
"id": 43,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
288288
"views": 1003,
289289
"posts_count": 3,
290290
"like_count": 0,
291-
"excerpt": ""
291+
"excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
292292
},
293293
{
294294
"id": 29,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
300300
"views": 810,
301301
"posts_count": 2,
302302
"like_count": 0,
303-
"excerpt": ""
303+
"excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
304304
},
305305
{
306306
"id": 38,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
312312
"views": 1115,
313313
"posts_count": 3,
314314
"like_count": 1,
315-
"excerpt": ""
315+
"excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
316316
},
317317
{
318318
"id": 44,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
324324
"views": 1487,
325325
"posts_count": 2,
326326
"like_count": 0,
327-
"excerpt": ""
327+
"excerpt": "Alex started a good discussion on the mailing list (May 3, 2019) about best practices when writing a new adapter:\nI wanted to ask if there are some additional guidelines on how to write good adapters for preCICE. I have the feeling that I might think\u2026"
328328
},
329329
{
330330
"id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
336336
"views": 718,
337337
"posts_count": 7,
338338
"like_count": 0,
339-
"excerpt": ""
339+
"excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
340340
},
341341
{
342342
"id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
348348
"views": 739,
349349
"posts_count": 2,
350350
"like_count": 2,
351-
"excerpt": ""
351+
"excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
352352
},
353353
{
354354
"id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
360360
"views": 638,
361361
"posts_count": 2,
362362
"like_count": 0,
363-
"excerpt": ""
363+
"excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
364364
}
365365
]
366366
}

assets/data/news.json

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
{
2-
"generated_at": "2025-11-21T06:26:37.409490",
2+
"generated_at": "2025-11-22T06:22:44.047495",
33
"topics": [
44
{
55
"id": 217,
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
2020
"last_posted_at": "2025-11-12T19:55:51.000Z",
2121
"like_count": 2,
2222
"posts_count": 2,
23-
"views": 39,
23+
"views": 40,
2424
"description": "We just uploaded a new preprint on arXiv A waveform iteration implementation for black-box multi-rate higher-order coupling, which is a compact summary of the dissertation of Benjamin Rodenberg. We explain..."
2525
},
2626
{
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
108108
"last_posted_at": "2025-04-07T04:59:59.909Z",
109109
"like_count": 4,
110110
"posts_count": 4,
111-
"views": 163,
111+
"views": 164,
112112
"description": "Summary: We have been developing a JSON schema for preCICE adapters and tools improving interoperability and enabling tooling support. Find out more about the schema and what you can do..."
113113
},
114114
{
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
229229
"last_posted_at": "2024-02-27T09:42:45.629Z",
230230
"like_count": 8,
231231
"posts_count": 4,
232-
"views": 1004,
232+
"views": 1005,
233233
"description": "The longer you wait for something, the more you appreciate it, right? preCICE v3 is finally out and we are pretty happy about it. v3.0.0 is a breaking release. This..."
234234
},
235235
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)