Update Discourse data data [skip ci]

Author: precice-bot

assets/data/faq.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
-  "generated_at": "2026-01-30T06:43:45.536607",
+  "generated_at": "2026-01-31T06:34:35.975602",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 44,
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/3d-1d-coupling/388",
       "created_at": "2020-11-13T07:39:48.596Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2020-11-16T08:51:56.471Z",
-      "views": 1677,
+      "views": 1678,
       "posts_count": 4,
       "like_count": 1,
       "excerpt": "Hi!\nis there a way to couple a 1D simulation (OpenModelica) with a 3D simulation (OpenFoam)?\nthx"
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
       "views": 503,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "Or: Can preCICE interpolate between an arbitrary / unstructured mesh and a regular / structured mesh?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 55,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
       "views": 474,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 54,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
       "views": 515,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
       "views": 516,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 26,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
       "views": 584,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 50,
@@ -285,10 +285,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/which-openfoam-versions-are-supported/50",
       "created_at": "2019-10-13T19:13:05.736Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-13T19:19:48.194Z",
-      "views": 844,
+      "views": 845,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 43,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
       "views": 1006,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 29,
@@ -309,10 +309,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-adaptive-meshes/29",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T20:59:30.598Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-08T12:19:14.122Z",
-      "views": 814,
+      "views": 815,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
       "views": 1122,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
-      "excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
       "views": 733,
       "posts_count": 7,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
       "views": 743,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 2,
-      "excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
+      "excerpt": ""
     },
     {
       "id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
       "views": 642,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
+      "excerpt": ""
     }
   ]
 }

assets/data/news.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generated_at": "2026-01-30T06:43:35.233404",
+  "generated_at": "2026-01-31T06:34:32.115643",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 2678,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2026-01-15T16:44:31.215Z",
       "like_count": 1,
       "posts_count": 5,
-      "views": 117,
+      "views": 121,
       "description": "Besides the preCICE Workshops (with the next one expected in March 2027), we regularly organize preCICE sessions in larger conferences. The WCCM 2026 conference will take place in Munich, Germany,..."
     },
     {
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-11-12T19:55:51.000Z",
       "like_count": 2,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 108,
+      "views": 110,
       "description": "We just uploaded a new preprint on arXiv A waveform iteration implementation for black-box multi-rate higher-order coupling, which is a compact summary of the dissertation of Benjamin Rodenberg. We explain..."
     },
     {
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-11-04T12:39:39.274Z",
       "like_count": 5,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 132,
+      "views": 134,
       "description": "Imagine a full week of learning as much as possible about coupling simulations and having all the people you need to talk to in the same room. That\u2019s exactly how..."
     },
     {
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-10-09T15:52:04.962Z",
       "like_count": 5,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 267,
+      "views": 268,
       "description": "Summary: With preCICE v3.3.0, we focused on improving clarity, portability, and tooling. The new release brings clearer coupling-state output and more helpful error messages. Tooling has been reworked significantly and..."
     },
     {
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-04-02T13:17:09.876Z",
       "like_count": 3,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 219,
+      "views": 220,
       "description": "Summary: Important long-term features see great progress with the new release preCICE release v3.2, such as different options to handle dynamic meshes. Other features were finally wrapped up and integrated,..."
     },
     {