Skip to content

Commit f82f3b6

Browse files
committed
Update Discourse data data [skip ci]
1 parent 849f20c commit f82f3b6

File tree

2 files changed

+23
-23
lines changed

2 files changed

+23
-23
lines changed

assets/data/faq.json

Lines changed: 14 additions & 14 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
{
22
"source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
3-
"generated_at": "2025-12-09T06:28:15.277976",
3+
"generated_at": "2025-12-10T06:28:42.226070",
44
"topics": [
55
{
66
"id": 27,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
99
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27",
1010
"created_at": "2019-09-23T20:55:55.190Z",
1111
"last_posted_at": "2025-08-11T13:12:45.035Z",
12-
"views": 3236,
12+
"views": 3237,
1313
"posts_count": 9,
1414
"like_count": 2,
1515
"excerpt": "I read that you do surface coupling?\nDo you support volume coupling too?"
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
2121
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/restarting-coupled-fsi-simulation-with-precice/117",
2222
"created_at": "2019-12-06T09:10:16.329Z",
2323
"last_posted_at": "2024-07-03T15:56:51.883Z",
24-
"views": 2295,
24+
"views": 2297,
2525
"posts_count": 11,
2626
"like_count": 5,
2727
"excerpt": "Dear all,\nI am trying to validate my fluid and structure mesh for the FSI1 case of cylinder-flap test. As the refinement of the fluid and structure mesh increases, it is difficult for implicit FSI coupling to converge. Therefore, my idea is to use a \u2026"
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
117117
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-can-i-restart-a-coupled-simulation/675",
118118
"created_at": "2021-07-29T13:29:19.539Z",
119119
"last_posted_at": "2021-07-29T13:31:08.839Z",
120-
"views": 1470,
120+
"views": 1471,
121121
"posts_count": 3,
122122
"like_count": 3,
123123
"excerpt": "Common question: \u201cMy simulation crashed after hours of running, but my solvers already has stored restart files. Do I need to do anything special in preCICE?\u201d"
@@ -225,10 +225,10 @@
225225
"url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/does-partitioned-coupling-introduce-error/55",
226226
"created_at": "2019-10-14T12:36:10.314Z",
227227
"last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:36:26.189Z",
228-
"views": 467,
228+
"views": 468,
229229
"posts_count": 2,
230230
"like_count": 0,
231-
"excerpt": ""
231+
"excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
232232
},
233233
{
234234
"id": 54,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
276276
"views": 833,
277277
"posts_count": 2,
278278
"like_count": 0,
279-
"excerpt": ""
279+
"excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
280280
},
281281
{
282282
"id": 43,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
288288
"views": 1003,
289289
"posts_count": 3,
290290
"like_count": 0,
291-
"excerpt": ""
291+
"excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
292292
},
293293
{
294294
"id": 29,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
300300
"views": 810,
301301
"posts_count": 2,
302302
"like_count": 0,
303-
"excerpt": ""
303+
"excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
304304
},
305305
{
306306
"id": 38,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
312312
"views": 1116,
313313
"posts_count": 3,
314314
"like_count": 1,
315-
"excerpt": ""
315+
"excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
316316
},
317317
{
318318
"id": 44,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
324324
"views": 1487,
325325
"posts_count": 2,
326326
"like_count": 0,
327-
"excerpt": ""
327+
"excerpt": "Alex started a good discussion on the mailing list (May 3, 2019) about best practices when writing a new adapter:\nI wanted to ask if there are some additional guidelines on how to write good adapters for preCICE. I have the feeling that I might think\u2026"
328328
},
329329
{
330330
"id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
336336
"views": 723,
337337
"posts_count": 7,
338338
"like_count": 0,
339-
"excerpt": ""
339+
"excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
340340
},
341341
{
342342
"id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
348348
"views": 739,
349349
"posts_count": 2,
350350
"like_count": 2,
351-
"excerpt": ""
351+
"excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
352352
},
353353
{
354354
"id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
360360
"views": 639,
361361
"posts_count": 2,
362362
"like_count": 0,
363-
"excerpt": ""
363+
"excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
364364
}
365365
]
366366
}

assets/data/news.json

Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
{
2-
"generated_at": "2025-12-09T06:28:10.317945",
2+
"generated_at": "2025-12-10T06:28:33.346447",
33
"topics": [
44
{
55
"id": 2678,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
99
"last_posted_at": "2025-12-01T13:41:03.261Z",
1010
"like_count": 0,
1111
"posts_count": 2,
12-
"views": 16,
12+
"views": 18,
1313
"description": "Besides the preCICE Workshops (with the next one expected in March 2027), we regularly organize preCICE sessions in larger conferences. The WCCM 2026 conference will take place in Munich, Germany,..."
1414
},
1515
{
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
2020
"last_posted_at": "2020-07-19T20:56:04.638Z",
2121
"like_count": 0,
2222
"posts_count": 2,
23-
"views": 787,
23+
"views": 788,
2424
"description": "News, announcements, \u201cblog\u201d-like posts..."
2525
},
2626
{
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
4242
"last_posted_at": "2025-11-04T12:39:39.274Z",
4343
"like_count": 5,
4444
"posts_count": 1,
45-
"views": 86,
45+
"views": 87,
4646
"description": "Imagine a full week of learning as much as possible about coupling simulations and having all the people you need to talk to in the same room. That\u2019s exactly how..."
4747
},
4848
{
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
5353
"last_posted_at": "2025-10-22T10:52:31.506Z",
5454
"like_count": 7,
5555
"posts_count": 4,
56-
"views": 222,
56+
"views": 225,
5757
"description": "Dear preCICE community, Some of you are already experimenting with just\u2011in\u2011time data mapping and other features introduced in preCICE v3.2. In my recently completed thesis, Flexible mesh\u2011particle coupling with preCICE,..."
5858
},
5959
{
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
6464
"last_posted_at": "2025-10-09T15:52:04.962Z",
6565
"like_count": 5,
6666
"posts_count": 1,
67-
"views": 239,
67+
"views": 240,
6868
"description": "Summary: With preCICE v3.3.0, we focused on improving clarity, portability, and tooling. The new release brings clearer coupling-state output and more helpful error messages. Tooling has been reworked significantly and..."
6969
},
7070
{
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
174174
"last_posted_at": "2024-07-12T19:58:06.171Z",
175175
"like_count": 4,
176176
"posts_count": 1,
177-
"views": 215,
177+
"views": 217,
178178
"description": "A familiar problem We know it\u2026 You started by searching if anyone had already coupled your favorite solver with preCICE. You found a paper from long ago, with authors kind..."
179179
},
180180
{
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
229229
"last_posted_at": "2024-04-24T20:00:56.599Z",
230230
"like_count": 5,
231231
"posts_count": 1,
232-
"views": 798,
232+
"views": 799,
233233
"description": "While preCICE v3.0.0 was finally released a few months ago, we still had to update all adapters, tutorials, documentation, the demo VM, and more. But there is nothing more to..."
234234
},
235235
{
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
284284
"last_posted_at": "2023-08-31T12:53:01.088Z",
285285
"like_count": 7,
286286
"posts_count": 1,
287-
"views": 471,
287+
"views": 472,
288288
"description": "Introduction Hello everyone , we\u2019d like to present our research project on improving the reproducibility of scientific software using Nix and NixOS. We (Simon and Max) are two students doing..."
289289
},
290290
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)