Skip to content

Commit cb4ef44

Browse files
voltagexEarl Warren
authored andcommitted
Minor grammatical fix to runner deletion message (go-gitea#7479)
WIP until someone else tells me whether the whole message should be changed or whether `s/mark/marked/` is enough. I am honestly not sure what "It may break building workflow." means in this context either but it doesn't sound correct to me. ## Checklist *snipped* - this is really minor, please let me know if there's a better checklist to use for changes like this ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. [Change is too minor] Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7479 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org> Co-committed-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org>
1 parent d46cf46 commit cb4ef44

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

options/locale/locale_en-US.ini

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3871,7 +3871,7 @@ runners.delete_runner = Delete this runner
38713871
runners.delete_runner_success = Runner deleted successfully
38723872
runners.delete_runner_failed = Failed to delete runner
38733873
runners.delete_runner_header = Confirm to delete this runner
3874-
runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and mark as failed. It may break building workflow.
3874+
runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and marked as failed. It may break building workflow.
38753875
runners.none = No runners available
38763876
runners.status.unspecified = Unknown
38773877
runners.status.idle = Idle

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)