#888 introduces ncycles_processing and fifo_depth parameters.
We should be able to prove the invariant that the number of busy cycles in the state BUSY cycles doesn't go over (fifo_depth + 1) * ncycles_processing.
@samuelgruetter proposed:
forall t s, execution t s -> forall tx, s = BUSY tx -> tx < (fifo_depth + 1) * ncycles_processing
#888 introduces
ncycles_processingandfifo_depthparameters.We should be able to prove the invariant that the number of busy cycles in the state
BUSY cyclesdoesn't go over(fifo_depth + 1) * ncycles_processing.@samuelgruetter proposed:
forall t s, execution t s -> forall tx, s = BUSY tx -> tx < (fifo_depth + 1) * ncycles_processing