Replies: 1 comment
-
No. Only consider instructions that have debug information. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Should we instrument the
__coverage__
function callfor the instruction without any
!dbg
metadata?For example, LOC 23 of example3.ll is
It does not matter for the pass/fail of test3 because the control flow never reaches to that instruction,
but I've got curious about general cases.
Should we consider making some hacky way to this case(where instruction does not have
!debug
metadata?)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions