Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
286 lines (225 loc) · 7.47 KB

IMPLEMENTATION_NOTES.md

File metadata and controls

286 lines (225 loc) · 7.47 KB

Implementation Notes - Distributed Compute v1.0

What Was Implemented

This document provides technical implementation details for the distributed compute feature.

Architecture Decisions

1. Push Model vs Pull Model

Decision: Use push model (nodes push results to master)
Rationale:

  • Reduces master complexity (no need to track scraping endpoints)
  • Minimizes network connections (nodes initiate all connections)
  • Better for firewall/NAT scenarios (only outbound connections from workers)
  • Aligns with existing VictoriaMetrics architecture

2. In-Memory Storage

Decision: Use in-memory storage for v1.0
Rationale:

  • Simple, no external database dependencies
  • Fast for development and testing
  • Sufficient for initial deployment scale
  • Easy to migrate to persistent storage in v1.5+

Trade-offs:

  • Jobs/nodes lost on master restart
  • No horizontal scaling of master (single instance)
  • Memory constrained by available RAM

3. FIFO Job Scheduling

Decision: Simple FIFO queue for v1.0
Rationale:

  • Minimal complexity
  • Predictable behavior
  • Good baseline for future optimization

Future Enhancements (v1.5+):

  • Priority queues
  • Resource-aware scheduling
  • Affinity rules (GPU jobs → GPU nodes)
  • Load balancing

4. HTTP/JSON Communication

Decision: Use HTTP with JSON payloads
Rationale:

  • Universal protocol, works everywhere
  • Easy to debug (curl, browser, etc.)
  • Well-understood by ops teams
  • Simple client implementation

Security Note: For production:

  • Add HTTPS/TLS
  • Implement mTLS for mutual authentication
  • Add API tokens/JWT

5. Master-as-Worker Safety

Decision: Require explicit flag + confirmation
Rationale:

  • Prevents accidental resource contention
  • Clear UX with warnings and risks
  • Allows development without multiple machines
  • Forces conscious decision for production

Code Structure

cmd/
  master/main.go        - Master node entry point
  agent/main.go         - Agent node entry point

pkg/
  models/
    node.go             - Node data structures
    job.go              - Job data structures
  api/
    master.go           - Master HTTP handlers
  store/
    memory.go           - In-memory storage implementation
  agent/
    client.go           - HTTP client for master communication
    hardware.go         - Hardware detection utilities

Concurrency & Thread Safety

Store Concurrency

  • MemoryStore uses separate mutexes for nodes, jobs, and queue
  • Read-write locks (RWMutex) allow concurrent reads
  • Critical section in GetNextJob uses full lock to prevent race

API Handlers

  • Each HTTP request runs in its own goroutine (Go standard)
  • Store methods handle all synchronization internally
  • No shared state between handlers

Agent Concurrency

  • Main goroutine: job polling loop
  • Background goroutine: heartbeat loop
  • Both communicate via same HTTP client (which is thread-safe)

Testing Strategy

Unit Tests

Not implemented in v1.0 (minimal scope)

Integration Tests

  • test_distributed.sh: End-to-end workflow validation
  • Tests all API endpoints
  • Validates state transitions
  • Verifies error handling

Manual Testing

  • Master-as-worker warning/confirmation
  • Agent registration and hardware detection
  • Job execution simulation
  • Existing Python workflow compatibility

Performance Considerations

Master Node

  • Memory: O(N) for nodes + O(M) for jobs
    • Typical: ~1KB per node, ~2KB per job
    • Can handle 10K nodes + 100K jobs in <1GB RAM
  • CPU: Minimal (HTTP request handling only)
    • API is I/O bound, not CPU bound
    • JSON encoding/decoding is fast

Compute Nodes

  • Polling: Default 10s interval, configurable
    • At 100 nodes, master sees 10 req/sec
    • Easily scaled with load balancer
  • Heartbeat: Default 30s interval
    • Lightweight, just updates timestamp

Network

  • Bandwidth: Results batched in single JSON payload
    • Typical payload: 1-10KB for metrics + analyzer output
    • Not suitable for raw video transfer (not intended)

Limitations & Known Issues

v1.0 Limitations

  1. No job persistence: Jobs lost on master restart
  2. No retry logic: Failed jobs require manual requeue
  3. No authentication: Trust-on-first-register only
  4. No multi-master: Single point of failure
  5. Simulated execution: Agent doesn't actually run FFmpeg yet

Not Bugs, By Design

  1. Nodes can have same hostname (UUID differentiates)
  2. Jobs don't auto-retry (intentional for v1.0)
  3. No live log streaming (results are batch uploaded)
  4. No job cancellation API (can add if needed)

Migration from Single Node

The distributed system is fully backward compatible with single-node workflows:

  • Python scripts continue to work
  • Docker stack unchanged
  • VictoriaMetrics/Grafana unaffected
  • Master/Agent are opt-in additions

Security Considerations

v1.0 Security Posture

  • HTTP (no encryption)
  • No authentication
  • Trust-on-first-register
  • UUID-based node identity

Risk Level: Development/Testing only

Production Hardening (Future)

  1. Transport Security

    • HTTPS/TLS for all endpoints
    • Certificate validation

  2. Authentication

    • API tokens per node
    • JWT for requests
    • Shared secrets

  3. Authorization

    • Role-based access control
    • Node capabilities → job restrictions

  4. Network Isolation

    • Private network for master-worker communication
    • Firewall rules
    • VPN/Wireguard mesh

Future Enhancements

v1.1 - Reliability

  • Job retry with exponential backoff
  • Dead node detection and cleanup
  • Job timeout and recovery

v1.2 - Smart Scheduling

  • Resource-aware placement (CPU/GPU/RAM matching)
  • Affinity and anti-affinity rules
  • Priority queues

v1.3 - Security

  • mTLS
  • API authentication
  • Audit logging

v1.4 - Persistence

  • PostgreSQL or SQLite for job/node storage
  • Results archival
  • Historical analytics

v1.5 - Multi-Master

  • Master election (Raft/etcd)
  • Distributed job queue
  • Horizontal scaling

v2.0 - Integration

  • Real FFmpeg execution in agent
  • Kubernetes operator
  • Helm charts
  • Prometheus metrics from master

Monitoring & Observability

Available Metrics (via logs)

  • Node registrations
  • Job dispatches
  • Job completions
  • Heartbeat failures

Future: Prometheus Metrics

  • Master: job queue depth, node count, job completion rate
  • Agent: job execution time, resource utilization

Recommended Alerts

  1. Master down (health check failure)
  2. No available nodes
  3. Job queue growing (backlog)
  4. High job failure rate

Developer Notes

Building

make build-distributed

Running Tests

./test_distributed.sh

Debugging

# Master logs
tail -f /tmp/master.log

# Agent logs
tail -f /tmp/agent.log

# Check state
curl http://localhost:8080/nodes | jq
curl http://localhost:8080/jobs | jq

Adding Features

  1. Update models in pkg/models/
  2. Add API handlers in pkg/api/
  3. Update store in pkg/store/
  4. Test with integration script
  5. Update documentation

Lessons Learned

  1. Keep it simple: In-memory storage was right choice for v1.0
  2. Safety first: Master-as-worker warnings prevented confusion
  3. Test early: Integration tests caught issues before manual testing
  4. Document risks: Clear docs on limitations prevent surprises
  5. Race conditions: Code review caught subtle concurrency bug

Credits

Implemented following the requirements in the original issue, with additional safety features (master-as-worker warnings) based on common sense and development best practices.