Skip to content

Conversation

@bzg
Copy link
Contributor

@bzg bzg commented Oct 28, 2024

See #197

@bfabio
Copy link
Contributor

bfabio commented Oct 30, 2024

Thanks @bzg, looks good to me!

Should we add a character limit to name?

@bfabio bfabio added vote-draft Change proposal to the Standard or to the governance procedures standard-minor-change This change is backward compatible. It's a new feature. labels Oct 30, 2024
@bfabio
Copy link
Contributor

bfabio commented Oct 30, 2024

@yaml-9000 minor-change

@yaml-9000
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution 🙏

This is now marked as a minor-change proposal to the standard,
this means that old versions of publiccode.yml will still be valid with this change.

Example of minor changes are additions of new keys or making keys optional.

The Chair will eventually pick up this proposal and start the voting procedure using @yaml-9000 vote-start

cc @publiccodeyml/chair @publiccodeyml/steering-committee

📄 Voting procedure | 📄 Working Group Charter | 🤖 bot commands

Co-authored-by: Fabio Bonelli <[email protected]>
@bzg
Copy link
Contributor Author

bzg commented Oct 30, 2024

Should we add a character limit to name?

If there is one for other occurrences of name in the standard, yes, why not, otherwise no, this is not necessary.

@bzg
Copy link
Contributor Author

bzg commented Feb 1, 2025

Hi, what can be done to help merge this PR? I'm unsure about the process. Thanks!

@bzg bzg closed this by deleting the head repository Mar 9, 2025
@bfabio
Copy link
Contributor

bfabio commented May 20, 2025

Hi @bzg, looks like the branch got deleted

@bzg
Copy link
Contributor Author

bzg commented May 20, 2025

Yes, I did some cleaning up with too heavy a hand.

Can you use the patch at https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/publiccodeyml/publiccode.yml/pull/198.patch ?

@bfabio
Copy link
Contributor

bfabio commented May 23, 2025

@bzg thanks, that'll work.

I think we could start the voting procedure soonish, but since this is the only proposal with some kind of early agreement, maybe we can wait for this other one as well so we vote for two instead of one?

@bzg
Copy link
Contributor Author

bzg commented May 23, 2025

Yes, this can certainly wait.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

standard-minor-change This change is backward compatible. It's a new feature. vote-draft Change proposal to the Standard or to the governance procedures

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants