You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _pages/partners.md
+29-12Lines changed: 29 additions & 12 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ scientists:
13
13
alt: "A pencil sketch of a round table with people sitting around it from different backgrounds working on laptops and also writing together."
14
14
excerpt: "Our catalog of vetted open source tools makes it easier for scientists to find the trusted tools that they need to develop their open science workflows."
15
15
title: "Help scientists find the open science tools that they need"
btn_label: View our growing list of accepted scientific Python packages
18
+
btn_class: btn--primary
16
19
mission:
17
20
- excerpt: "Domain-specific communities can partner with PyOpenSci to leverage both our peer review process and development of Python packaging packaging guidelines."
18
21
packaging-easier:
@@ -21,30 +24,49 @@ packaging-easier:
21
24
title: "Let's make packaging easier for scientists, together"
22
25
excerpt: "Given the numerous diverse packaging options, many communities are crafting their own guidelines and review processes. Partnering with pyOpenSci enables your community to:
23
26
24
-
* tap into and contribute to an established community-owned set of packaging standards.
27
+
* tap into and contribute to an established community-owned set of packaging guidelines.
25
28
26
29
* mitigate the redundancy of multiple communities creating their own processes and standards.
27
30
28
31
29
32
Aligning packaging criteria supports increased consistency in packaging approaches across the Python ecosystem. This consistency will lower the barrier of entry for new potential contributors."
alt: "A black and white pencil sketch of a group of 5 women sitting and standing around a laptop working together."
34
-
excerpt: "
35
-
pyOpenSci is driven by a **vibrant community** of technical packaging experts, open science enthusiasts, and Pythonistas. When you partner with pyOpenSci, you:
40
+
excerpt: "pyOpenSci is driven by a **vibrant community** of technical packaging experts, open science enthusiasts, and Pythonistas. When you partner with pyOpenSci, you:
36
41
37
-
* become part of a community rich in expertise, ready to assist you with your packaging challenges.
42
+
* Become part of a community rich in expertise, ready to assist you with your packaging challenges.
38
43
39
-
* As a package grows, we help your community maintainers decide what to do if they need to step down from maintenance roles, be it finding a new maintainer or gracefully archiving the package for safekeeping."
44
+
* As a package grows, we help your community maintainers decide what to do if they need to step down from maintenance roles, be it finding a new maintainer or gracefully archiving the package for safekeeping."
excerpt: "Your community can take advantage of our existing, developed and well-documented peer review process which includes:
41
52
53
+
* **A diverse and growing team of editors.** We ask partner communities to have at least 2 members of their community on our editorial team. We want our partner community to make the final decision on whether a package should receive the label of being affiliated. Typically an editor will run 2-4 reviews a year. [Learn more about the editor role.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/editors-guide.html)
54
+
55
+
* **A suite of community reviewers whose expertise spans numerous scientific domains.** We ask that partner communities help us find reviews in their specific domain areas as packages come in for review. [Learn more about the requirements for reviewers.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/reviewer-guide.html)
56
+
57
+
* **Community driven packaging resources and guidelines:** Our packaging guidelines drive the peer review process. Instead of communities creating their own individual guidelines, pyOpenSci partners collaborate with us to expand packaging resources."
alt: "diagram with a set of 3 boxes with arrows pointing to the right. The first box says submit your package with a code icon above it. The second says Review with pyOpensci Standards below. Blow the second box is a dark purple box that says Your community standards in it. And an arrow pointing to that box that says customized review. The third box says Accepted pyos + community affiliated."
45
64
excerpt: "
46
-
pyOpenSci adds an extra layer of community-specific review to our established open peer review process. This allows domain-specific scientific Python communities to vet affiliated tools through our robust peer review process. Communities then don't have to develop and maintain their own review processes and software guidelines."
65
+
pyOpenSci adds an [extra layer of community-specific review](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/partners/scientific-communities.html) to our established open peer review process. This allows domain-specific scientific Python communities to vet affiliated tools through our robust peer review process. Communities then don't have to develop and maintain their own review processes and software guidelines."
alt: "Diagram with a light purple background. On the left there is the pyOpenSci purple flower and it says accepted with a check mark above. There are two arrows leading to boxes on the right. The top box says JOSS published with a check next to it and the JOSS logo. The box below says Community Affiliated with a check. THe boxes are numbered 1,2,3. "
@@ -102,15 +124,10 @@ We will:
102
124
{% include div_purple_bottom.html %}
103
125
104
126
<divclass="pyos-section"markdown="1">
105
-
106
127
<divclass="content"markdown="1">
107
-
## Leverage our peer review process
108
128
109
-
Your community can take advantage of our existing, developed and well-documented peer review process which includes:
129
+
{% include feature_row id="leverage" type="right" %}
110
130
111
-
-**A diverse and growing team of editors.** We ask partner communities to have at least 2 members of their community on our editorial team. We want our partner community to make the final decision on whether a package should receive the label of being "affiliated". Typically an editor will run 2-4 reviews a year. [Learn more about the editor role.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/editors-guide.html)
112
-
-**A suite of community reviewers whose expertise spans numerous scientific domains.** We ask that partner communities help us find reviews in their specific domain areas as packages come in for review. [Learn more about the requirements for reviewers.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/reviewer-guide.html)
113
-
-**Community driven packaging resources and guidelines:** Our packaging guidelines drive the peer review process. Instead of communities creating their own individual guidelines, pyOpenSci partners collaborate with us to expand packaging resources.
0 commit comments