Swelling, thickness change, and active material volume fraction #2576
Unanswered
DavidMStraub
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I guess the answer is that this would require a mechanics submodel and a porosity submodel which are coupled, correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Oh, because active material volume fraction change would correspond to LAM. Got it. Will accept my own answer then 😉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I have a question about the current particle mechanics submodels. If I understand correctly, they require a function parameter
{Domain} electrode volume change
, which is a function of stoichiometry and maximum concentration, which corresponds to the particle volume change. It is then assumed that the relative particle volume change translates 1:1 in a cell thickness change, since the yz-dimensions obviously don't change. However, it is currently not possible to model a change in electrode active material volume fraction caused by swelling, correct? Naively, one could think that swelling would lead to both active material volume fraction increase (i.e. porosity reduction) and thickness change and it would be interesting if that can be modelled.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions