You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have run a simple experiment (attached) for 20 cycles, enabling both chemical and mechanical degradation effects (attached options);
option={
"SEI":"solvent-diffusion limited",
"particle mechanics": ("swelling and cracking", "swelling only"),
"particle" : "Fickian diffusion",
"SEI on cracks": "true",
"loss of active material": "stress-driven",
"thermal": "lumped",
"SEI film resistance": "distributed",
"SEI porosity change" : "true",
"lithium plating": "reversible",
}
experiment = pybamm.Experiment(
[(
"Discharge at 1C until 2.7V",
"Charge at 0.5C until 4.2V",
"Hold at 4.2V until 50mA"
)] * 20
)
I am trying to understand the loss of lithium to side reactions in this.
LLI (Chemical degradation)
Loss of lithium to SEI [mol] = 0.000115406
Loss of lithium to lithium plating [mol] = 0.000577182
Total lithium lost from electrolyte [mol] = 0.000331981
LAM (Mechanical degradation)
Loss of active material in positive electrode [mol] = 0.000021151
Loss of active material in negative electrode [mol] = 0.000026540
Total lithium lost to side reactions [mol] is coming up to be = 0.000115406 + 0.000577182 + 0.000331981 + 0.000021151 + 0.000026540 = 0.001072261.
However,
From simulation, Total lithium lost to side reactions[mol] = 0.001140848
Where is that extra loss in the lithium is coming from during simulation ? (0.001140848 - 0.001072261 = 0.00006858727395935 mol )
I understand the total loss of capacity is not a linear relation between LAM and LLI ([https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.104]). But, I guess conservation of mass should be valid at any instant.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Team,
I have run a simple experiment (attached) for 20 cycles, enabling both chemical and mechanical degradation effects (attached options);
option={
"SEI":"solvent-diffusion limited",
"particle mechanics": ("swelling and cracking", "swelling only"),
"particle" : "Fickian diffusion",
"SEI on cracks": "true",
"loss of active material": "stress-driven",
"thermal": "lumped",
"SEI film resistance": "distributed",
"SEI porosity change" : "true",
"lithium plating": "reversible",
}
experiment = pybamm.Experiment(
[(
"Discharge at 1C until 2.7V",
"Charge at 0.5C until 4.2V",
"Hold at 4.2V until 50mA"
)] * 20
)
I am trying to understand the loss of lithium to side reactions in this.
LLI (Chemical degradation)
Loss of lithium to SEI [mol] = 0.000115406
Loss of lithium to lithium plating [mol] = 0.000577182
Total lithium lost from electrolyte [mol] = 0.000331981
LAM (Mechanical degradation)
Loss of active material in positive electrode [mol] = 0.000021151
Loss of active material in negative electrode [mol] = 0.000026540
Total lithium lost to side reactions [mol] is coming up to be = 0.000115406 + 0.000577182 + 0.000331981 + 0.000021151 + 0.000026540 = 0.001072261.
However,
From simulation, Total lithium lost to side reactions[mol] = 0.001140848
Where is that extra loss in the lithium is coming from during simulation ? (0.001140848 - 0.001072261 = 0.00006858727395935 mol )
I understand the total loss of capacity is not a linear relation between LAM and LLI ([https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.104]). But, I guess conservation of mass should be valid at any instant.
Thanks in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions