Replies: 6 comments 11 replies
-
Hi, Facing similar issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not sure if there is a better way around, but you could manually split your drive cycle into smaller ones and then each cycle would run one of those chunks so you don't have to store the whole simulation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for all the suggestions! really appreciated! I have tried different ways to resolve this issues with having non-repetitive current profiles experiments, as listed below,
I hope that may help a bit. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tried your suggestion,
error
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sir, I tried the solution mentioned, but getting different error, ( I have the recent pybamm version)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, Here is the code, Kindly let me know where i am going wrong.
Error
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
My input current profiles have around 10k–20k steps (the current is different for each second) in one cycle, and I am trying to figure out whether I can only save certain steps within this super long cycle to reduce the RAM requirements (as currently I can only solve 600–1500 steps due to limited RAM). I thought about several solutions for this issue:
Solution 1 appears to be the most promising, but I'm not sure if it's feasible. I really appreciate any further suggestions regarding how to solve my current issues.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions