Unusual reverse capacity trend during aging simulation despite changing initial concentrations #3801
Unanswered
MirAbbasAli2A
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Pybamm team, does anyone have any thoughts on how I can fix this behaviour? @tinosulzer , @brosaplanella , @TomTranter , @DrSOKane , @rtimms |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It's not immediately obvious what is going wrong, you will need to keep debugging by looking at the outputs like you are doing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello Pybamm Team -
I was running an aging experiment to reproduce Figure 5 in this paper written by @tinosulzer. The only differences are that I was using a DFN model and using a coupled degradation analysis. I get a very unusual trend where my discharge capacity increases with cycle number.
When analyzing the problem further, I find that the porosity is just changing at the separator and not anywhere else in the negative electrode.
Additionally, I kept getting the warning of Q_Li>Q_p. I have read over previous discussions and have found that changing the initial concentrations of the electrodes was a potential solution, but this didn't help (at least didn't help beyond a certain point).
Here is my code:
Can someone please help explain to me where I am going wrong?
Thank you for your assistance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions