Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi! We have now moved our discussions to Discourse. Please post your question there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
see #4943 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
I am runing an aging model in pybamm considering various side reactions. I thought the following model setting, i.e.,

model = pybamm.lithium_ion.DFN(
{
"SEI": "none",
"SEI porosity change": "false",
"lithium plating": "none",
"lithium plating porosity change": "false",
"particle mechanics": ("none", "none"),
"SEI on cracks": "false",
"loss of active material": "none",
}
)
would return exactly same solution with just using model= pybamm.lithium_ion.DFN(). However, they returned different results under same operations, the terminal volatge shows like this:
Is there any possible reason for this? I am wondering maybe there are some default side reaction model runing under the first model setting, is that true?
Thank you very much for your time!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions