Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
I don't think a flush is necessary, as we only need to temporally store the global to local node indices. Since |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is there a reason you don't flush
self.__assoc__
after an insert or call and make it intotorch.empty()
again? Since you are always overwriting it anyways and it would eventually fill up over time would that be more memory efficient or is there a downside to that?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions