Does the existing PYG framework supports the imbalanced graph size in graph classification task? #5995
Unanswered
lichen0411
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
All PyG models can naturally be applied on graphs with varying size. There are multiple ways to either ignore or respect graph sizes during classification tasks (e.g., |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I recently encountered a problem with graph classification. For the application I am researching now, the extracted key-points are designed to construct graphs. However, the number of graph nodes created by different samples is different. Specifically, the graph size of the intra-class may have a large difference and the graph size of the inter-class may have a small difference. I tried different graph classification methods such as GCN, GAT, diffpool, and some dynamic graph convolution methods such as AdaptConv, DGCNN, etc. However, their performance is less satisfactory. I also tried some graph similarity learning methods such as MGMN using a cross-attention to learn the cross-graph features and found the optimization is hard resulting in a bad performance. I guess the problem may be the constructed graph is insufficient to represent to target, or the existing graph classification methods and graph similarity learning methods are sensitive to the imbalanced graph size. I'm not confident about whether my guess is right. So does the existing PYG framework supports the imbalanced graph size in graph classification task? Sincerely looking for your response.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions