@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ solution of the last computation, calling methods with arguments like this::
2929
3030 The legend for all graphtik diagrams, generated by :func: `.legend()`.
3131
32- The same :meth: `.Plotter .plot() ` method applies also for:
32+ The same :meth: `.Plottable .plot() ` method applies also for:
3333
3434- :class: `.NetworkOperation `
3535- :class: `.Network `
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ If you want all details, plot the solution::
6868
6969.. Tip ::
7070 The `pydot.Dot <https://pypi.org/project/pydot/ >`_ instances returned by
71- :meth: `.Plotter .plot() ` are rendered directly in *Jupyter/IPython * notebooks
71+ :meth: `.Plottable .plot() ` are rendered directly in *Jupyter/IPython * notebooks
7272 as SVG images.
7373
7474 You may increase the height of the SVG cell output with something like this::
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ directive from :mod:`.sphinxext` module to embed graph-plots into your generated
136136
137137 the variable name containing what to render, which it can be:
138138
139- - an instance of :class:`.Plotter ` (such as :class:`.NetworkOperation`,
139+ - an instance of :class:`.Plottable ` (such as :class:`.NetworkOperation`,
140140 :class:`.Network`, :class:`.ExecutionPlan` or :class:`.Solution`);
141141
142142 - an already plotted ``pydot.Dot`` instance, ie, the result of a :meth:`.plot()` call
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ which you may :graphtik:`reference <addmul-anchor>` with this syntax:
231231 .. hint ::
232232 In this case, the ``:graphvar: `` parameter is not really needed, since
233233 the code contains just one variable assignment receiving a subclass
234- of :class: `.Plotter ` or :class: `pydot.Dot ` instance.
234+ of :class: `.Plottable ` or :class: `pydot.Dot ` instance.
235235
236236 Additionally, the doctest code producing the *plottable * does not have to be contained
237237 in the *graphtik * directive.
0 commit comments