For the paper we need a table which shows our obtained results in comparison to the previously published results.
I suggest the following format, here a excerpt from the FB15k table
 | 
 | 
MR | 
MRR (%) | 
AMR (%) | 
Hits@1 (%) | 
Hits@3 (%) | 
Hits@5 (%) | 
Hits@10 (%) | 
| ComplEx | 
[Troullion2016]o | 
- | 
69.2 | 
- | 
59.9 | 
75.9 | 
- | 
84.0 | 
 | 
best | 
171.16 ± 16.05 | 
19.13 ± 0.45 | 
2.46 ± 0.28 | 
10.06 ± 0.42 | 
20.82 ± 0.67 | 
27.59 ± 0.94 | 
38.03 ± 1.02 | 
 | 
... | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| ConvE | 
[Dettmers2018]n | 
51 | 
65.7 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
best | 
50.76 ± 0.40 | 
59.56 ± 0.06 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
with the following legend:
- With b / a / w / n we denote that the best / average / worst / non-deterministic rank
 
- [Troullion2016] should be a proper reference