You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/source/notebooks/iv_vs_priors.ipynb
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@
586
586
"id": "3237bb49",
587
587
"metadata": {},
588
588
"source": [
589
-
"We'll now fit two models and estimate the implied treatment effect. We fit the defauly IV model and then the same model that uses spike and slab priors on the input variables."
589
+
"We'll now fit two models and estimate the implied treatment effect. We fit the default IV model and then the same model that uses spike and slab priors on the input variables."
590
590
]
591
591
},
592
592
{
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@
1495
1495
"id": "2d6e01dd",
1496
1496
"metadata": {},
1497
1497
"source": [
1498
-
"The parameter estimates are healthy for both models. With the spike and slab being a little bit more agressive. But differences are more pronounced in the cull of the instruments. "
1498
+
"The parameter estimates are healthy for both models. With the spike and slab being a little bit more aggressive. But differences are more pronounced in the cull of the instruments. "
0 commit comments