|
| 1 | +.. _dependency-groups: |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +================= |
| 4 | +Dependency Groups |
| 5 | +================= |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +This specification defines Dependency Groups, a mechanism for storing package |
| 8 | +requirements in ``pyproject.toml`` files such that they are not included in |
| 9 | +project metadata when it is built. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Dependency Groups are suitable for internal development use-cases like linting |
| 12 | +and testing, as well as for projects which are not built for distribution, like |
| 13 | +collections of related scripts. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Fundamentally, Dependency Groups should be thought of as being a standardized |
| 16 | +subset of the capabilities of ``requirements.txt`` files (which are |
| 17 | +``pip``-specific). |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +Specification |
| 20 | +============= |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Examples |
| 23 | +-------- |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +This is a simple table which shows a ``test`` group:: |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + [dependency-groups] |
| 28 | + test = ["pytest>7", "coverage"] |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +and a similar table which defines ``test`` and ``coverage`` groups:: |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + [dependency-groups] |
| 33 | + coverage = ["coverage[toml]"] |
| 34 | + test = ["pytest>7", {include-group = "coverage"}] |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +The ``[dependency-groups]`` Table |
| 37 | +--------------------------------- |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +This PEP defines a new section (table) in ``pyproject.toml`` files named |
| 40 | +``dependency-groups``. The ``dependency-groups`` table contains an arbitrary |
| 41 | +number of user-defined keys, each of which has, as its value, a list of |
| 42 | +requirements (defined below). These keys must be |
| 43 | +`valid non-normalized names <https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/name-normalization/#valid-non-normalized-names>`__, |
| 44 | +and must be |
| 45 | +`normalized <https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/name-normalization/#normalization>`__ |
| 46 | +before comparisons. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +Tools SHOULD prefer to present the original, non-normalized name to users by |
| 49 | +default. If duplicate names, after normalization, are encountered, tools SHOULD |
| 50 | +emit an error. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +Requirement lists under ``dependency-groups`` may contain strings, tables |
| 53 | +("dicts" in Python), or a mix of strings and tables. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Strings in requirement lists must be valid |
| 56 | +`Dependency Specifiers <https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/dependency-specifiers/>`__, |
| 57 | +as defined in :pep:`508`. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +Tables in requirement lists must be valid Dependency Object Specifiers. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Dependency Object Specifiers |
| 62 | +---------------------------- |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Dependency Object Specifiers are tables which define zero or more dependencies. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +This PEP standardizes only one type of Dependency Object Specifier, a |
| 67 | +"Dependency Group Include". Other types may be added in future standards. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Dependency Group Include |
| 70 | +'''''''''''''''''''''''' |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +A Dependency Group Include includes the dependencies of another Dependency |
| 73 | +Group in the current Dependency Group. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +An include is defined as a table with exactly one key, ``"include-group"``, |
| 76 | +whose value is a string, the name of another Dependency Group. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +For example, ``{include-group = "test"}`` is an include which expands to the |
| 79 | +contents of the ``test`` Dependency Group. |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +Includes are defined to be exactly equivalent to the contents of the named |
| 82 | +Dependency Group, inserted into the current group at the location of the include. |
| 83 | +For example, if ``foo = ["a", "b"]`` is one group, and |
| 84 | +``bar = ["c", {include-group = "foo"}, "d"]`` is another, then ``bar`` should |
| 85 | +evaluate to ``["c", "a", "b", "d"]`` when Dependency Group Includes are expanded. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +Dependency Group Includes may specify the same package multiple times. Tools |
| 88 | +SHOULD NOT deduplicate or otherwise alter the list contents produced by the |
| 89 | +include. For example, given the following table: |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +.. code:: toml |
| 92 | +
|
| 93 | + [dependency-groups] |
| 94 | + group-a = ["foo"] |
| 95 | + group-b = ["foo>1.0"] |
| 96 | + group-c = ["foo<1.0"] |
| 97 | + all = ["foo", {include-group = "group-a"}, {include-group = "group-b"}, {include-group = "group-c"}] |
| 98 | +
|
| 99 | +The resolved value of ``all`` SHOULD be ``["foo", "foo", "foo>1.0", "foo<1.0"]``. |
| 100 | +Tools should handle such a list exactly as they would handle any other case in |
| 101 | +which they are asked to process the same requirement multiple times with |
| 102 | +different version constraints. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +Dependency Group Includes may include lists containing Dependency Group |
| 105 | +Includes, in which case those includes should be expanded as well. Dependency |
| 106 | +Group Includes MUST NOT include cycles, and tools SHOULD report an error if |
| 107 | +they detect a cycle. |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +Package Building |
| 110 | +---------------- |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +Build backends MUST NOT include Dependency Group data in built distributions as |
| 113 | +package metadata. This means that PKG-INFO in sdists and METADATA in wheels |
| 114 | +do not include any referencable fields containing Dependency Groups. |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +It is valid to use Dependency Groups in the evaluation of dynamic metadata, and |
| 117 | +``pyproject.toml`` files included in sdists will naturally still contain the |
| 118 | +``[dependency-groups]`` table. However, the table contents are not part of a |
| 119 | +published package's interfaces. |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +Installing Dependency Groups |
| 122 | +---------------------------- |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +Tools which support Dependency Groups are expected to provide new options and |
| 125 | +interfaces to allow users to install from Dependency Groups. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +No syntax is defined for expressing the Dependency Group of a package, for two |
| 128 | +reasons: |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +* it would not be valid to refer to the Dependency Groups of a third-party |
| 131 | + package from PyPI (because the data is defined to be unpublished) |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +* there is not guaranteed to be a current package for Dependency Groups -- part |
| 134 | + of their purpose is to support non-package projects |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +For example, a possible pip interface for installing Dependency Groups |
| 137 | +would be: |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +.. code:: shell |
| 140 | +
|
| 141 | + pip install --dependency-groups=test,typing |
| 142 | +
|
| 143 | +Note that this is only an example. This PEP does not declare any requirements |
| 144 | +for how tools support the installation of Dependency Groups. |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +Overlapping Install UX with Extras |
| 147 | +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +Tools MAY choose to provide the same interfaces for installing Dependency |
| 150 | +Groups as they do for installing extras. |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +Note that this specification does not forbid having an extra whose name matches |
| 153 | +a Dependency Group. |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +Users are advised to avoid creating Dependency Groups whose names match extras. |
| 156 | +Tools MAY treat such matching as an error. |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +Validation and Compatibility |
| 159 | +---------------------------- |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +Tools supporting Dependency Groups may want to validate data before using it. |
| 162 | +However, tools implementing such validation behavior should be careful to allow |
| 163 | +for future expansions to this spec, so that they do not unnecessarily emit |
| 164 | +errors or warnings in the presence of new syntax. |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +Tools SHOULD error when evaluating or processing unrecognized data in |
| 167 | +Dependency Groups. |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +Tools SHOULD NOT eagerly validate the list contents of **all** Dependency |
| 170 | +Groups. |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +This means that in the presence of the following data, most tools will allow |
| 173 | +the ``foo`` group to be used, and will only error when the ``bar`` group is |
| 174 | +used: |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +Reference Implementation |
| 177 | +======================== |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +The following Reference Implementation prints the contents of a Dependency |
| 180 | +Group to stdout, newline delimited. |
| 181 | +The output is therefore valid ``requirements.txt`` data. |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +.. code-block:: python |
| 184 | +
|
| 185 | + import re |
| 186 | + import sys |
| 187 | + import tomllib |
| 188 | + from collections import defaultdict |
| 189 | +
|
| 190 | + from packaging.requirements import Requirement |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | +
|
| 193 | + def _normalize_name(name: str) -> str: |
| 194 | + return re.sub(r"[-_.]+", "-", name).lower() |
| 195 | +
|
| 196 | +
|
| 197 | + def _normalize_group_names(dependency_groups: dict) -> dict: |
| 198 | + original_names = defaultdict(list) |
| 199 | + normalized_groups = {} |
| 200 | +
|
| 201 | + for group_name, value in dependency_groups.items(): |
| 202 | + normed_group_name = _normalize_name(group_name) |
| 203 | + original_names[normed_group_name].append(group_name) |
| 204 | + normalized_groups[normed_group_name] = value |
| 205 | +
|
| 206 | + errors = [] |
| 207 | + for normed_name, names in original_names.items(): |
| 208 | + if len(names) > 1: |
| 209 | + errors.append(f"{normed_name} ({', '.join(names)})") |
| 210 | + if errors: |
| 211 | + raise ValueError(f"Duplicate dependency group names: {', '.join(errors)}") |
| 212 | +
|
| 213 | + return normalized_groups |
| 214 | +
|
| 215 | +
|
| 216 | + def _resolve_dependency_group( |
| 217 | + dependency_groups: dict, group: str, past_groups: tuple[str, ...] = () |
| 218 | + ) -> list[str]: |
| 219 | + if group in past_groups: |
| 220 | + raise ValueError(f"Cyclic dependency group include: {group} -> {past_groups}") |
| 221 | +
|
| 222 | + if group not in dependency_groups: |
| 223 | + raise LookupError(f"Dependency group '{group}' not found") |
| 224 | +
|
| 225 | + raw_group = dependency_groups[group] |
| 226 | + if not isinstance(raw_group, list): |
| 227 | + raise ValueError(f"Dependency group '{group}' is not a list") |
| 228 | +
|
| 229 | + realized_group = [] |
| 230 | + for item in raw_group: |
| 231 | + if isinstance(item, str): |
| 232 | + # packaging.requirements.Requirement parsing ensures that this is a valid |
| 233 | + # PEP 508 Dependency Specifier |
| 234 | + # raises InvalidRequirement on failure |
| 235 | + Requirement(item) |
| 236 | + realized_group.append(item) |
| 237 | + elif isinstance(item, dict): |
| 238 | + if tuple(item.keys()) != ("include-group",): |
| 239 | + raise ValueError(f"Invalid dependency group item: {item}") |
| 240 | +
|
| 241 | + include_group = _normalize_name(next(iter(item.values()))) |
| 242 | + realized_group.extend( |
| 243 | + _resolve_dependency_group( |
| 244 | + dependency_groups, include_group, past_groups + (group,) |
| 245 | + ) |
| 246 | + ) |
| 247 | + else: |
| 248 | + raise ValueError(f"Invalid dependency group item: {item}") |
| 249 | +
|
| 250 | + return realized_group |
| 251 | +
|
| 252 | +
|
| 253 | + def resolve(dependency_groups: dict, group: str) -> list[str]: |
| 254 | + if not isinstance(dependency_groups, dict): |
| 255 | + raise TypeError("Dependency Groups table is not a dict") |
| 256 | + if not isinstance(group, str): |
| 257 | + raise TypeError("Dependency group name is not a str") |
| 258 | + return _resolve_dependency_group(dependency_groups, group) |
| 259 | +
|
| 260 | +
|
| 261 | + if __name__ == "__main__": |
| 262 | + with open("pyproject.toml", "rb") as fp: |
| 263 | + pyproject = tomllib.load(fp) |
| 264 | +
|
| 265 | + dependency_groups_raw = pyproject["dependency-groups"] |
| 266 | + dependency_groups = _normalize_group_names(dependency_groups_raw) |
| 267 | + print("\n".join(resolve(pyproject["dependency-groups"], sys.argv[1]))) |
| 268 | +
|
| 269 | +History |
| 270 | +======= |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | +- October 2024: This specification was approved through :pep:`735`. |
0 commit comments