Skip to content

Conversation

@sethmlarson
Copy link
Contributor

@sethmlarson sethmlarson commented Apr 24, 2025

  • Adds reservation of directory names under .dist-info and reserves a few names already in use.
  • Adds description of .dist-info/sboms directory.

I wasn't sure whether to add a "guide" or not yet, as there aren't any especially "user-facing" ways to have an SBOM end up in this directory beyond your build backend/build tool supporting it. Should I leave that for a later task, then?


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://python-packaging-user-guide--1853.org.readthedocs.build/en/1853/

Copy link
Member

@webknjaz webknjaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's probably no need for a guide. Especially if build backends don't have a toggle. It might be useful to note in the existing ones which backend versions implement it.

Also, it might be a good idea to migrate the PEP itself into the specs section.

I've made a few suggestions to RST as I'm trying to keep the style consistent and it's easier to distinguish dirs vs regular files based on the trailing slash..

Co-authored-by: 🇺🇦 Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <[email protected]>
@webknjaz webknjaz enabled auto-merge April 26, 2025 19:00
Copy link
Member

@webknjaz webknjaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@webknjaz webknjaz added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into pypa:main with commit 2ecf748 Apr 26, 2025
7 checks passed
@sethmlarson sethmlarson deleted the pep-770 branch April 30, 2025 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants