-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Deprecate tools.setuptools.license-files #4837
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
abravalheri
merged 3 commits into
pypa:feature/pep639
from
cdce8p:639-deprecated-setuptools.license-files
Feb 18, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
| Deprecated ``tools.setuptools.license-files`` in favor of ``project.license-files`` | ||
| and added exception if ``project.license-files`` and ``tools.setuptools.license-files`` | ||
| are used together. -- by :user:`cdce8p` |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you throwing an exception when the intention is to deprecate something? Emitting a DeprecationWarning should be surely sufficient? This exception breaks tons of workloads on our side.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This configuration has been documented as
provisionalsince its introduction, so it was never stable to require a deprecation period.The breaking change is documented in the changelogs for the major version bump to inform users adaptation may be required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, I had a look on how this exception is being triggered in the wild and I can see
pylintas a typical example: pylint-dev/pylint#10289They did not had
project.license-filesdefined but ratter insetup.cfg.@cdce8p, was the intention just to double definition inside
pyproject.tomlor more general to avoid license-files being defined in multiple places?If it was the first, should we change the condition it to:
(Untested)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #4899.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems for pylint in particular, I was actually the one who introduce the issue almost three years ago 😅
pylint-dev/pylint#7076
The config as I had written it was problematic though.
metadata.license-files(from setup.cfg) would always be overwritten bytool.setuptools.license-files. So in a sense, raising an error here was kind of a good thing as it's fixed now.Left a comment on the PR already (see #4899 (review)) but in a sense the intention was to prohibit using
project.license-filesandtool.setuptools.license-filestogether.