|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: 2025 Conference Recap |
| 3 | +date: 2024-05-14 |
| 4 | +categories: |
| 5 | + - Conference Updates |
| 6 | +authors: |
| 7 | + - masonegger |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +The annual PyTexas Conference was held at the Austin Central Library April 11 - 13, 2024 in Austin, TX. |
| 11 | +It was fantasic year, with new record breaking events. |
| 12 | +We're excited to share some behind the scenes data with you. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +<!-- more --> |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## PyTexas 2025 Conference |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +The 2025 conference was one for the memory books. |
| 19 | +From fantastic speakers, generous sponsors, and an always welcoming Community, the conference was alive with conversation and friendship. |
| 20 | +It was great to many people this year returning, wearing their PyTexas shirts from previous years, as well as seeing them bring their friends to come enjoy the conference. |
| 21 | +Without any further ado, let's discuss PyTexas 2025. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## What Was New This Year? |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +PyTexas has a philosophy of incremental change. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### Live Captions |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +During the pandemic many conferences moved to virtual formats, and as they |
| 32 | +returned to in-person activities, they included a hybrid experience. PyTexas 2020 |
| 33 | +was originally planned as an in-person event that shifted to virtual out of necessity. |
| 34 | +In 2021 the organizers decided to take a hiatus and evaluate the situation again |
| 35 | +in 2022. In 2022, PyTexas was the first Python conference globally to come back |
| 36 | +in-person in March, just prior to PyCon US in Salt Lake City. At that time, funding |
| 37 | +and staffing were _severely_ limited, so we were unable to do a hybrid experience. |
| 38 | +These limitations continued into 2023, leading to a in-person only conference for |
| 39 | +both years. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +However, in 2024, we were finally staffed and financially stable enough to experiment |
| 42 | +with a hybrid conference. We decided to take a more novel approach and run our |
| 43 | +hybrid conference through the [PyTexas Discord Server](https://discord.gg/jNPAbcNukj). |
| 44 | +We have been building a community on Discord since 2022, which now hosts our virtual |
| 45 | +meetup, so we thought it would be a good experiment to hold our virtual conference |
| 46 | +there. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +We are happy to report that our hybrid conference was a success. We sold 43 virtual |
| 49 | +tickets, and attendees who had an in-person ticket were also able to join the virtual |
| 50 | +experience. We had many in-person attendees thank us for this experience, as some |
| 51 | +had to step out for brief periods and were still able to attend the conference. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +One thing we strived for this year was to blend the in-person and virtual experience |
| 54 | +as much as possible so attendees from both would be able to interact with each other. |
| 55 | +We did this a few ways. First, we encouraged people to chat in a conference-specific |
| 56 | +Discord text chat. Both in-person and virtual attendees engaged with each other |
| 57 | +and bridged the gap. We were very pleased with the level of interaction that was |
| 58 | +occurring. Next, we used [Slido](https://www.slido.com/) for all speaker questions. |
| 59 | +This decision was highly praised by both attendees and speakers alike. Slido |
| 60 | +allowed us to have attendees, either remote or in-person, ask questions |
| 61 | +to the speaker during their talk. Other attendees could see these questions and |
| 62 | +upvote the ones they also wanted to ask. We had our organizers moderating the |
| 63 | +questions and approving them prior to being visible, which allowed us to ensure |
| 64 | +safety for our speakers and attendees. The questions were then asked _into the |
| 65 | +microphone_ on stage by our emcees, allowing the speaker to answer and the question |
| 66 | +to be recorded on video. This sped up our Q&A portion and made speakers feel |
| 67 | +more comfortable answering questions. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Overall, the hybrid experience was a success, and we look forward to continuing |
| 70 | +with it in the future. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +### |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +Tutorials are not new to the PyTexas Conference, but it is the first time we've |
| 75 | +had tutorials since 2017. Long-time attendee, speaker, and Keynoter |
| 76 | +[Andrew "Pandy" Knight](https://www.pytexas.org/2024/schedule/tutorials/#def-test_my_code_with_pytest) |
| 77 | +and organizer [Mason Egger](https://www.pytexas.org/2024/schedule/tutorials/#def-test_my_code_with_pytest) delivered the tutorials this year. We did not hold |
| 78 | +an open CFP for tutorials this year, but instead preselected our presenters. We made |
| 79 | +this choice because we weren't sure what the turnout would be for the tutorials, |
| 80 | +so we decided to select people who are known PyTexas regulars who would attend |
| 81 | +either way and were willing to take the gamble on attendance. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Fortunately, tutorials were a smashing success. We sold 97 tutorial tickets this year, |
| 84 | +which were an add-on to the main conference and gave access to both tutorials. |
| 85 | +Nearly every tutorial ticket holder checked in and attended at least one tutorial, |
| 86 | +with the vast majority attending both. |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +The community reaction to tutorials was universally strong and we're excited |
| 89 | +to bring tutorials back next year. We're still deciding if we're going to open |
| 90 | +a CFP for tutorials next year, but signs are trending in that direction. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## Attendance |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +2024 was a record breaking year for ticket sales. This year we sold 319 attendance |
| 96 | +tickets. We sold 276 in-person tickets and 43 virtual tickets. We initially set |
| 97 | +our capacity at 250 in-person attendees, then had to increase it two weeks prior |
| 98 | +to the conference to 275. Somehow, we had an off-by-one error and wound up selling |
| 99 | +276 in-person tickets. Of the 276 tickets sold, we had 229 attendees check in. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +### Statistics |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +**Location** |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +{: width="500"} |
| 106 | +{: width="500"} |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +* **81.5%** of attendees were from Texas |
| 109 | + * **59.2%** from Austin |
| 110 | + * **14.1%** from Houston |
| 111 | + * **12.7%** from Dallas - Fort Worth |
| 112 | + * **9.9%** from San Antonio |
| 113 | + * **4.2%** from other areas in Texas |
| 114 | +* **13.9%** are from other states within the United States |
| 115 | +* **4.6%** were from outside the United States |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +**Roles** |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +{: width="500"} |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +* **42.8%** - Software Engineer |
| 122 | +* **11.6%** - Students |
| 123 | +* **8.7%** - Marketing/Sales/Business |
| 124 | +* **8.1%** - DevOps |
| 125 | +* **6.4%** - Data Science |
| 126 | +* **5.2%** - Hobbyist/Enthusiast |
| 127 | +* **4.6%** - Executive/Senior Leadership |
| 128 | +* The rest consists of ML Engineers, Security, People Managers, Product Management, QA |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +**Experience** |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +{: width="500"} |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +* **11.6%** - Less than 1 year |
| 135 | +* **24.9%** - 1 to 3 years |
| 136 | +* **20.2%** - 4 to 7 years |
| 137 | +* **20.2%** - 7 to 15 years |
| 138 | +* **23.1%** - 15+ years |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +**Orders by Day** |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +A few conclusions we've made based on ticket sales this year and years prior: |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +* You have your "regulars" who attend every year. They will take advantage of |
| 147 | +early bird sales. |
| 148 | +* Announcements drive ticket sales. We saw noticeable increases after we announced |
| 149 | +keynotes, tutorials, speakers, etc. |
| 150 | + * The largest increase was after we released the talk schedule. |
| 151 | +* You will still sell a majority of your tickets in the month leading up to the event. |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +## Sponsors |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +Sponsorship in the return to in-person conferences world have been few and far |
| 156 | +between. We are immensely grateful our sponsors this year, |
| 157 | +[Temporal Technologies](https://temporal.io) and [AppSignal](https://www.appsignal.com/) |
| 158 | +for their support. We also want to thank the [Python Software Foundation](https://python.org) |
| 159 | +for their generous grant. |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +Without them certain portions of our event would simply not have been financially possible. |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +### Statistics |
| 164 | +This year we brought in **$12,750** from sponsorships and grants. We reached out |
| 165 | +to roughly 50 companies this year to sponsor PyTexas. When they responded, the |
| 166 | +response was usually: |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +* We aren't sponsoring events right now. |
| 169 | +* You aren't big enough for us to consider. |
| 170 | +* We haven't finalized event plans, we'll get back to you. |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +We publish this information not to shame companies who aren't sponsoring. We |
| 173 | +understand the current economic climate. We write this so that other conference |
| 174 | +organizers who are experiencing the same thing don't feel like it's just them. |
| 175 | +It's everyone. |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +## Finances |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +PyTexas 2024 cost **$36,657.59** to operate. The largest budget items for us |
| 180 | +were venue, catering, A/V, and our after party. We sold 319 tickets of varying cost, |
| 181 | +including add-ons such as shirts, tutorials, and the after party, and made **$36,545.00** |
| 182 | +in gross revenue (prior to fees). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first |
| 183 | +year that ticket sales were able to completely fund the conference. This was possible |
| 184 | +due to the increase in capacity for in-person, plus the addition of a virtual ticket. |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +All excess funds from this year will be used to fund ongoing PyTexas programs such |
| 187 | +as the meetup, infrastructure costs, and any future PyTexas event (such as the [PyTexas 2025 Conference](https://pytexas.org/2025)). |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +## Speakers |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +This was by far one of the most exciting speaker lineups we've ever had! We continue |
| 192 | +to get compliments on how good the talks were and how much everyone enjoyed them. |
| 193 | +This year we were overjoyed to invite [Lynn Root](https://www.roguelynn.com/) |
| 194 | +and [Carol Willing](https://www.willingconsulting.com/) to keynote this year. Both |
| 195 | +gave _phenomenal_ keynotes that people kept raving about. |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +From teaching Python, to AI/ML, to DevOps, to using Python for audio, this year |
| 198 | +we had something for everyone. |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +### CFP Statistics |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | +CFP submissions this year broke yet another record of ours, the most submissions |
| 203 | +to our CFP. Here's some stats: |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +* 103 submissions from 81 speakers from a wide variety of backgrounds. |
| 206 | + * 5 indicated they were first time speakers |
| 207 | + * 59 indicated they had never spoken at PyTexas before |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +The vast majority of our CFP submissions came in within the last few weeks of the |
| 210 | +CFP |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +#### The Prevalence of DevRel |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | +Due to the recent anecdotes and social media posts about Developer Relations |
| 217 | +professionals dominating conference speaking slots, we decided to ask our speakers |
| 218 | +if they were considered "Professional Speakers", meaning they work in Developer |
| 219 | +Relations, Sales, Marketing, or any part of their job requires them to speak |
| 220 | +at conferences. |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +**This year we only gathered data, no decisions about acceptances were made based on this data.** |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +* 16/81 speakers submitted to PyTexas responded to "Are you a professional Speaker" with yes |
| 225 | +* 21/103 proposals are from this group |
| 226 | +* 4 speakers had talks initially accepted out of an 18 slot lineup |
| 227 | + * 3 of these speakers declined or had to cancel, along with 3 others who do not consider themselves professional speakers |
| 228 | + * In the filling of these 6 rejections, 2 more professional speakers were accepted |
| 229 | +* This leads us to a final of 3 speakers who consider themselves professional speakers out of 18 talks that are scheduled, leading us to ~17% of our conference being made up of professional speakers. |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +**Tutorials and Keynote Speakers are not included in this calculation.** |
| 232 | + |
| 233 | +### Speaker Statistics |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +We had a _great_ selection of diverse speakers this year. Here's a more in-depth |
| 236 | +breakdown of this years speakers: |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +#### Speaker Race/Ethnicity |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +* **63.6%** - White/Caucasian |
| 243 | +* **22.7%** - Asian/Pacific Islander |
| 244 | +* **4.5%** - Jewish |
| 245 | +* **4.5%** - Black or African American |
| 246 | +* **4.5%** - Hispanic |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | +#### Speaker Gender |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | +* **59.1%** - Male |
| 253 | +* **31.8%** - Female |
| 254 | +* **4.5%** - Non-binary |
| 255 | +* **4.5%** - Prefer not to say |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +#### Speaker Professional Role |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | + |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | +* **27.3%** - Data Scientist |
| 262 | +* **18.2%** - Developer Relations |
| 263 | +* **13.6%** - DevOps |
| 264 | +* **9.1%** - Academic (Teacher, Professor, etc) |
| 265 | +* **9.1%** - QA |
| 266 | +* **9.1%** - Machine Learning Engineer |
| 267 | +* **4.5%** - Senior Leadership |
| 268 | +* **4.5%** - Cyber Security |
| 269 | +* **4.5%** - Student |
| 270 | + |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | +#### Speaker Location |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | + |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | +* **86.4%** - Outside of Texas but within the United States |
| 277 | +* **13.6%** - Texas Resident |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | +## Opportunity Grants |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | +Every year we offer opportunity grants to community members who request assistance |
| 282 | +to attend PyTexas. In 2023 we provided a total of $1000 to two members of our community so |
| 283 | +they could attend. This year we were proud to be able to **more than double** the |
| 284 | +amount of money we were able to disperse. This year we provided a total of $2500 to five |
| 285 | +individuals to attend, all of whom came from under represented communities in tech! |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | +While we weren't able to provide financial assistance to every applicant, we |
| 288 | +were able to provide free virtual tickets to every person who applied for assistance |
| 289 | +so they could watch and interact with the conference, regardless of their location. |
| 290 | + |
| 291 | +## Conclusion |
| 292 | + |
| 293 | +2024 was by far our most exciting and largest PyTexas event yet. It was heartening |
| 294 | +to surpass our pre-pandemic numbers, and not by a little, but a **lot**. We're |
| 295 | +excited to continue to see the Python community in Texas grow and to continue |
| 296 | +providing events for the forseeable future. All recordings of the talks can be |
| 297 | +found on the [PyTexas 2024 website](https://www.pytexas.org/2024/schedule/full_schedule/) |
| 298 | +or on our [YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAMLQkY7TZM&list=PL0MRiRrXAvRjMAfx42eiokiAmfclUX-6S). |
| 299 | + |
| 300 | +[PyTexas 2025](https://pytexas.org/2025) dates have already been set, we'll |
| 301 | +be returning to the [Austin Central Public Library](https://library.austintexas.gov/central-library) April 11 - 13, 2025. |
| 302 | + |
| 303 | +We hope to see y'all there! |
| 304 | + |
0 commit comments