Skip to content

Conversation

@Riateche
Copy link
Contributor

@Riateche Riateche commented Nov 25, 2024

The user will now call our contract so that we can withdraw fees to the treasury account.

Not sure about the migration path for devnet/testnet. We can redeploy the program itself but the storage account also needs to be migrated somehow.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 3, 2024 2:39pm
proposals ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 3, 2024 2:39pm
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 3, 2024 2:39pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 3, 2024 2:39pm
insights ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 3, 2024 2:39pm

@Riateche Riateche merged commit 9c49daf into main Dec 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@Riateche Riateche deleted the lazer-solana-fees branch December 4, 2024 17:36
cprussin pushed a commit to cprussin/pyth-crosschain that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
* refactor(lazer): change verify_message to a contract call, add test

* feat(lazer): add treasury and fees to solana contract

* feat(lazer): make treasury configurable, add migration

* feat(lazer): add extra space to contract's pda

* fix(lazer): keep old names for legacy structs for compatibility

* refactor(lazer): keep good names for new types and methods
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants