Documentation review

[tleonhardt]

I made a thorough read through our existing documentation and attempted to improve it.

The kinds of things I was looking for include:

1. Try to fix anything which is outdated, incorrect, or inaccurate
2. Fix any place there was a TODO in the documentation by adding the missing documentation
3. Add links to the auto-generated API documentation for classes, methods, and functions where it makes sense
4. Improve wording anywhere it was lacking in clarity
5. Add links to relevant examples where it makes sense
6. Replace cut-and-paste help command output with updated versions that look slightly different

[github-actions]

🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.79%. Comparing base (e3e0d6f) to head (1cb3550).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1511      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.81%   98.79%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        4961     4961              
==========================================
- Hits         4902     4901       -1     
- Misses         59       60       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	98.79% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

📋 Review Summary

This pull request provides a comprehensive and much-needed overhaul of the documentation. The changes significantly improve clarity, consistency, and accuracy across the board. The addition of links to the API documentation and examples is particularly helpful.

🔍 General Feedback

• Excellent work updating the documentation to reflect the latest changes and best practices.
• The consistent use of links to the API documentation is a great improvement.
• The updated examples and command outputs are very helpful for users.
• I found a couple of minor typos, which I've pointed out in inline comments.
• I have one question about the removal of the mkdocstrings block in docs/features/clipboard.md.

[tleonhardt]

@gemini-cli /review

[github-actions]

🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

[github-actions]

📋 Review Summary

This is an excellent and comprehensive documentation update. The changes significantly improve the clarity, accuracy, and navigability of the documentation. The updates to command outputs, version recommendations, and explanations of complex topics like readline compatibility are particularly valuable.

🔍 General Feedback

• The addition of links to the API documentation, examples, and external resources is a huge improvement for user experience.
• Updating the command output examples makes the documentation much more accurate and trustworthy.
• The improved explanations and use of admonitions (like !!! warning) for tricky subjects are very helpful.

I found only a couple of very minor typos, which I've left as suggestions. Overall, this is a fantastic contribution to the project.

[tleonhardt]

@gemini-cli /review

[github-actions]

🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

[tleonhardt]

@gemini-cli /review

[github-actions]

🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

[tleonhardt]

@gemini-cli /review

[github-actions]

🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.