Skip to content

Actions: python/cpython

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
175,873 workflow run results
175,873 workflow run results

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

[3.13] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Check labels #189973: Pull request #136679 labeled by bedevere-app bot
9s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.13
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.13
9s
gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC Check labels #189972: Pull request #136676 unlabeled by bedevere-app bot
11s picnixz:docs/hashlib/hmac-notes-72570
picnixz:docs/hashlib/hmac-notes-72570
11s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Check labels #189971: Pull request #136678 labeled by bedevere-app bot
7s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
7s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Check labels #189970: Pull request #136678 labeled by bedevere-app bot
9s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
9s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Check labels #189969: Pull request #136678 labeled by bedevere-app bot
8s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
8s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Tests #160845: Pull request #136678 opened by miss-islington
6m 20s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
6m 20s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Check labels #189968: Pull request #136678 opened by miss-islington
7s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
7s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Lint #84552: Pull request #136678 opened by miss-islington
31s miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
miss-islington:backport-a02cf19-3.14
31s
[3.14] gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (GH-136676) Read the Docs PR preview #6937: Pull request #136678 opened by miss-islington
10s
10s
gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC Check labels #189967: Pull request #136676 unlabeled by bedevere-app bot
10s picnixz:docs/hashlib/hmac-notes-72570
picnixz:docs/hashlib/hmac-notes-72570
10s
gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (#136676) Tests #160844: Commit a02cf19 pushed by picnixz
25m 42s main
main
25m 42s
gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (#136676) mypy #15719: Commit a02cf19 pushed by picnixz
21s main
main
21s
gh-72570: mention the incompatibility of XOFs with HMAC (#136676) Lint #84551: Commit a02cf19 pushed by picnixz
41s main
main
41s
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Codespaces Prebuilds #11312: by github-codespaces bot
20m 15s main
main
20m 15s
Compiling 3.13.1 fails when /usr/local/include/pyconfig.h is outdated Update GH projects #48281: Issue #129019 labeled by picnixz
9s
9s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Tests #160843: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
25m 4s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
25m 4s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Check labels #189966: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
8s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
8s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Lint #84550: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
54s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
54s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Tests #160842: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
23s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
23s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Check labels #189965: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
9s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
9s
gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module Lint #84549: Pull request #136670 synchronize by kumaraditya303
40s kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
kumaraditya303:asyncio-perf
40s
Should we allow relative includes? (i.e. #include "../_ssl.h") Update GH projects #48279: Issue #121223 labeled by picnixz
18s
18s
Should we allow relative includes? (i.e. #include "../_ssl.h") Update GH projects #48280: Issue #121223 labeled by picnixz
7s
7s
Introduce seperate LDFLAGS for executable and shared library build targets Update GH projects #48278: Issue #136677 labeled by brianschubert
9s
9s
Document that libssl is needed, not just OpenSSL Update GH projects #48277: Issue #116461 labeled by picnixz
5s
5s
ProTip! You can narrow down the results and go further in time using created:<2025-07-15 or the other filters available.