Commit 2bd3895
authored
Prior to issue #120485 these servers did not allow port reuse, which
makes sense as the behavior of port reuse is surprising if you're not
expecting it. It's unclear to me why these services were switched to
allow port reuse, but I believe the desired behavior (unless subclasses
opt in) is to not allow port reuse.
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323170
1 parent 8979d3a commit 2bd3895
File tree
5 files changed
+7
-4
lines changed- Lib
- http
- logging
- test
- xmlrpc
- Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins
5 files changed
+7
-4
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
115 | 115 | | |
116 | 116 | | |
117 | 117 | | |
118 | | - | |
| 118 | + | |
119 | 119 | | |
120 | 120 | | |
121 | 121 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1018 | 1018 | | |
1019 | 1019 | | |
1020 | 1020 | | |
1021 | | - | |
| 1021 | + | |
1022 | 1022 | | |
1023 | 1023 | | |
1024 | 1024 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1036 | 1036 | | |
1037 | 1037 | | |
1038 | 1038 | | |
1039 | | - | |
| 1039 | + | |
1040 | 1040 | | |
1041 | 1041 | | |
1042 | 1042 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
578 | 578 | | |
579 | 579 | | |
580 | 580 | | |
581 | | - | |
| 581 | + | |
582 | 582 | | |
583 | 583 | | |
584 | 584 | | |
| |||
Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
0 commit comments