-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.2k
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
Hello,
Prior 3.13 it was possible to set a trace in a specific thread from another thread by leveraging _PyEval_SetTrace
, with pure Python. Now one can either set a trace for the current thread or all the threads using PyEval_SetTrace
or PyEval_SetTraceAllThreads
.
The change:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/108433/files#diff-9e7eb7e81667528dfa3a35bbf32fe622d4721c3c71385ea0ea2250abbd15d545R21
Interestingly, the profiling counterpart seems to be still available in the C API.
The use case I am interested in is a dedicated monitoring thread connected to a distributed observability system. This thread itself should not be traced as it manages tracing for the rest of the process.
Would it be possible to reinstate _PyEval_SetTrace
back to the private C API?
Also, the new sys.monitoring
module seems to offer a more high-level interface for debuggers and profilers, but it is unclear whether it is possible to limit the events to a certain thread. (unless of course one checks every event which does not seem efficient).
Alternatively, would writing an extension to expose this function be a better approach?
I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions regarding this. Thank you!
cc @vstinner
CPython versions tested on:
3.13
Operating systems tested on:
macOS