-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.3k
Fix typing.TYPE_CHECKING docs to reflect PEP 649. #134813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
larryhastings
merged 1 commit into
python:main
from
larryhastings:typing_type_checking_doc_fix
May 28, 2025
Merged
Fix typing.TYPE_CHECKING docs to reflect PEP 649. #134813
larryhastings
merged 1 commit into
python:main
from
larryhastings:typing_type_checking_doc_fix
May 28, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary.
JelleZijlstra
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
|
Thanks @larryhastings for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary. (cherry picked from commit d7256ae) Co-authored-by: larryhastings <[email protected]>
|
GH-134822 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
larryhastings
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…134822) Fix typing.TYPE_CHECKING docs to reflect PEP 649. (GH-134813) typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary. (cherry picked from commit d7256ae) Co-authored-by: larryhastings <[email protected]>
Pranjal095
pushed a commit
to Pranjal095/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2025
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary.
taegyunkim
pushed a commit
to taegyunkim/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2025
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--134813.org.readthedocs.build/