-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.4k
gh-96863: Fix subprocess.Popen.wait to raise ProcessLookupError for external waits #137804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ea5a376
Fix subprocess.Popen.wait to raise ProcessLookupError for external waits
Writtic d8af14f
Ensure ProcessLookupError is raised when waiting for killed process
Writtic cb8d874
Handle ProcessLookupError with a try–except block, since it’s not alw…
Writtic a542c71
Handle ProcessLookupError in wait calls for subprocesses in test_eintr
Writtic f77e2ea
Ensure process is killed in test_wait_after_external_wait
Writtic 327f904
Use f-string for exception message in test_wait_after_external_wait
Writtic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2025-08-15-14-06-33.gh-issue-96863.rUk3aJ.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
| Fix :meth:`subprocess.Popen.wait` returning zero always when process already | ||
| waited on externally. Now raises :exc:`ProcessLookupError` instead of losing | ||
| exit status. Preserves ``SIGCHLD=SIG_IGN`` compatibility. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gpshead I think that we should specify status code rather than raise exception because it will change current behavior. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Callers do not expect wait() to raise an exception when the process has died by default because our behavior has been not to raise. Often callers don't even care about the exit code. As seen in the tests that had to be updated due to this proposed change. I'm sure people have written code that calls wait multiple times as well, expecting later calls to be no-ops. We don't want to break that.
I'll reply further on the issue. I do not think we want this feature.