You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/monthly-meeting/2025-04.md
+3-3Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Example topics for discussion:
58
58
| Language | 30 days progress |
59
59
| -------- | ------------------ |
60
60
| Brazilian Portuguese | +0.91% |
61
-
|Simplifed Chinese| +0.56% |
61
+
|Simplified Chinese | +0.56% |
62
62
| Romanian | +0.30% |
63
63
| Russian | +0.20% |
64
64
| Japanese | +0.16% |
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Example topics for discussion:
95
95
- General agreement for a light-touch & pragmatic approach to managing language coordinators,
96
96
for example approving any coordinator nominated by a core developer, or a similar policy.
97
97
- Translations fall within the Editorial Board's remit, so they might decide a policy statement.
98
-
- Stan has suggested some changes to PEP 545 on [Discourse](https://discuss.python.org/t/83534) about tranlsation management (dealing with inactive translators), translation quality (mass pushing of poor quality machine translations) and improving methods of finding translators (All currently awaiting SC review) and another [Discourse](https://discuss.python.org/t/75750/3) on switcher requirements (inconclusive),
98
+
- Stan has suggested some changes to PEP 545 on [Discourse](https://discuss.python.org/t/83534) about translation management (dealing with inactive translators), translation quality (mass pushing of poor quality machine translations) and improving methods of finding translators (All currently awaiting SC review) and another [Discourse](https://discuss.python.org/t/75750/3) on switcher requirements (inconclusive),
99
99
but these weren't discussed due to audio problems.
100
100
101
101
### Ensemble contributor session
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Example topics for discussion:
126
126
- Ned notes that a frequent blocker is that a seemingly small change can represent a philosophical decision, which take time to reach consensus on.
127
127
Experienced reviewers can spot these types of change quite quickly. How do we communicate this to new contributors?
128
128
- It is disheartening to have a first PR languish unreviewed, or have 70 comments of back-and-forth debate.
129
-
- Hugo noted the examplar of the *string examples* PR, seeking to add an example snippet to each `str` method.
129
+
- Hugo noted the exemplar of the *string examples* PR, seeking to add an example snippet to each `str` method.
130
130
This is unreviewable with everything in one PR, but e.g. splitting to many small PRs might help refine the process.
131
131
Just a single change request blocks an entire PR, whereas smaller PRs are easier to merge quickly.
0 commit comments