Infra: add newlines so admonition text is shown (#3756)

Author: hugovk

peps/pep-0003.rst

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Created: 25-Sep-2000
 Post-History:
 
 .. withdrawn::
+
    This PEP contained guidelines for handling bug reports in the Python
    bug tracker.  It has been replaced by the
    `Developer's Guide description of issue triaging

peps/pep-0009.rst

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Post-History:
 Resolution: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/2YMHVPRDWGQLA5A2FKXE2JMLM2HQEEGW/
 
 .. withdrawn::
+
    As of 05-Jan-2016, this PEP is officially deprecated and replaced
    by :pep:`12`.  All PEPs should now use the reStructuredText format
    described by :pep:`12`, and plaintext PEPs will no longer be

peps/pep-0042.rst

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ Created: 12-Sep-2000
 Post-History:
 
 .. withdrawn::
-   This PEP has been `withdrawn as obsolete`_.
+
+   It is `obsolete`_.
    All new feature requests should  either go to the `Python bug tracker`_
    for very simple requests or the `Ideas Discourse category`_ for
    everything else.  The rest of this document is retained for historical
@@ -331,4 +332,4 @@ Building and Installing
 
 .. _`Python bug tracker`: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues
 .. _`Ideas Discourse category`: https://discuss.python.org/c/ideas/6
-.. _`withdrawn as obsolete`: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/108#issuecomment-249603204
+.. _`obsolete`: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/108#issuecomment-249603204

peps/pep-0103.rst

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ Created: 01-Jun-2015
 Post-History: 12-Sep-2015
 
 .. withdrawn::
-   This PEP was withdrawn as it's too generic and doesn't really deals
+
+   It is too generic and doesn't really deal
    with Python development. It is no longer updated.
 
    The content was moved to `Python Wiki`_. Make further updates in the

peps/pep-0204.rst

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Python-Version: 2.0
 Post-History:
 
 .. rejected::
+
    After careful consideration, and a period of meditation, this
    proposal has been rejected. The open issues, as well as some
    confusion between ranges and slice syntax, raised enough questions

peps/pep-0211.rst

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Post-History:
 
 
 .. rejected::
+
    The approach in the later :pep:`465` was eventually accepted
    in lieu of this PEP. The :pep:`Rejected Ideas
    <465#rejected-alternatives-to-adding-a-new-operator>`

peps/pep-0216.rst

@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ Superseded-By: 287
 
 
 .. withdrawn::
-   This PEP is withdrawn by the author.  It has been superseded by :pep:`287`.
+
+   It has been superseded by :pep:`287`.
 
 
 Abstract

peps/pep-0224.rst

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Python-Version: 2.1
 Post-History:
 
 .. rejected::
-   This PEP has been rejected.
+
    See :ref:`224-rejection` for more information.
 
 Introduction

peps/pep-0225.rst

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Post-History:
 
 
 .. rejected::
+
    The approach in the later :pep:`465` was eventually accepted
    in lieu of this PEP. The :pep:`Rejected Ideas
    <465#rejected-alternatives-to-adding-a-new-operator>`

peps/pep-0239.rst

@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ Python-Version: 2.2
 Post-History: 16-Mar-2001
 
 .. rejected::
-   This PEP is rejected.  The needs outlined in the rationale section
+
+   The needs outlined in the rationale section
    have been addressed to some extent by the acceptance of :pep:`327`
    for decimal arithmetic.  Guido also noted, "Rational arithmetic
    was the default 'exact' arithmetic in ABC and it did not work out as