Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

(testing to see if I get a comment from the new coverage workflow when I make a PR from a branch on the upstream repo)

(testing to see if I get a comment from the new coverage workflow when I make a PR from a branch on the upstream repo)
This reverts commit 0f841a9.
@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Health
src 97%
Summary 97% (7364 / 7608)

Minimum allowed line rate is 90%

This was referenced Aug 22, 2025
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood deleted the AlexWaygood-patch-1 branch August 22, 2025 14:34
@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member Author

AlexWaygood commented Aug 22, 2025

Oh interesting -- it looks like the bot previously posted a comment after the first commit, that it's now deleted?

image

@Daraan
Copy link
Contributor

Daraan commented Aug 22, 2025

Oh interesting -- it looks like the bot previously posted a comment after the first commit, that it's now deleted?

Yes this is controlled by the recreate: true option.

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member Author

that specific aspect was a bit surprising to me because it's a bit hard to track how coverage improved or regressed over the course of a PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants