|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "Motivation: a failed attempt at reuse" |
| 3 | +--- |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Background |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Tom Monks is the Principal Investigator on STARS. His interest in open and reproducible simulation research began with an unsuccessful attempt to share a model with the NHS in England. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## The original model |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +A few years ago, Tom was part of a team that developed a discrete-event simulation model of stroke care in England using **Simul8**, a commercial simulation platform. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +To support replication, the team published full details of the model design, parameters, assumptions, and system flow in the following paper: |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +> Monks T, Worthington D, Allen M, Pitt M, Stein K, James MA. A modelling tool for capacity planning in acute and community stroke services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):530. doi: [10.1186/s12913-016-1789-4](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1789-4). PMID: 27688152; PMCID: PMC5043535. |
| 16 | +
|
| 17 | +{width=80%} |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## A request for reuse |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +After publication, an NHS organisation covering two large cities in England asked to reuse the model to help redesign and evaluate their stroke service. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +The research team was happy to share the Simul8 model, Excel interface, and usage instructions. However, several barriers soon became clear: |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +::: {.callout-important title="Problem 1"} |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +The NHS organisation did not have budget for the commercial simulation software. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +::: |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +::: {.callout-important title="Problem 2"} |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +The Simul8 licence held by the research team did not allow sharing the model via the cloud. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +::: |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +::: {.callout-important title="Problem 3"} |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +The NHS could have commissioned the research team to carry out the work, but that would have cost even more. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +::: |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +## Lessons learned |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +In the end, the model could not be reused. This experience raised an important question: |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +> **Can others actually use the models and materials we publish?** |
| 48 | +
|
| 49 | +It showed that even detailed reporting is not enough if reuse depends on restricted tools or resources. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +## What came next? |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +This experience helped shape later research into reproducibility and reuse in simulation. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +The team has since developed **open-source versions** of the stroke model in **Python** and **R**, freely available for others to use and adapt. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +<a class="research-btn" href="https://github.com/pythonhealthdatascience/pydesrap_stroke"> |
| 58 | + ➤ View Python version of the stroke model |
| 59 | +</a> |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +<a class="research-btn" href="https://github.com/pythonhealthdatascience/rdesrap_stroke"> |
| 62 | + ➤ View R version of the stroke model |
| 63 | +</a> |
0 commit comments