Fix quantizer tests after dq conv is enabled #10569
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10569
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit 808ff19 with merge base 48ad9f6 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73898719 |
digantdesai
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
pytorch-bot bot
pushed a commit
to pytorch/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
Summary: X-link: pytorch/executorch#10569 Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs Test Plan: CI Differential Revision: D73898719
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73898719 |
mcr229
force-pushed
the
export-D73898719
branch
from
b4a83f6 to
8e82257
Compare
mcr229
added a commit
to mcr229/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10569 Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs, we enable operator selection for quantization Reviewed By: digantdesai Differential Revision: D73898719
mcr229
added a commit
to mcr229/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2025
Summary: Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs, we enable operator selection for quantization Reviewed By: derekxu, digantdesai Differential Revision: D73898719
mcr229
added a commit
to mcr229/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2025
Summary: Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs, we enable operator selection for quantization Reviewed By: derekxu, digantdesai Differential Revision: D73898719
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73898719 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10569 Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs, we enable operator selection for quantization Reviewed By: derekxu, digantdesai Differential Revision: D73898719
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73898719 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: Fixing some broken tests after we enabled dq convs
Differential Revision: D73898719