-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 751
Refactoring Portable Operators to Standardize op_name Format #12941
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/12941
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 6 New Failures, 45 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 101f7b3 with merge base b1d09fd ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This PR needs a
|
|
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none" |
50678b3 to
018cd1b
Compare
018cd1b to
98f2017
Compare
lucylq
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the refactoring work!
…#12941) ### Summary Minor refactor to standardize how operator names are printed when debugging. Especially useful when hitting a missing operator error.
Summary
Minor refactor to standardize how operator names are printed when debugging. Especially useful when hitting a missing operator error.