Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
Here is what Grok had to say about the differences between Eclipse Public License version 1.0 and version 2.0? https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_bacb2528-1ffc-4d4a-b96f-b888027d3912 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
As a user, I'd like to see the license updated. To be fair though, the current use of EPL 1.0 does not prevent me from using the library, so this is a nice-to-have, not a deal-breaker. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Move to EPL 2.0 became effective in logback version 1.5.27. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What is the position of logback contributors and users regarding the upgrade of license to EPL 2.0 from EPL 1.0?
Any objections regarding this change?
Here are some relevant links:
https://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170829eplv2.php
https://fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-eclipse-public-license/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions