Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
-
/cc @ia3andy, @quarkusio/devtools |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
13 replies
-
@aloubyansky any thought? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The
pom.xml
that is generated by my extension project's integration tests (by way of @RegisterExtension) inintegration-tests/target/quarkus-codestart-test/my-extension-c0b1482a-0b6f-4469-9e6a-e0339a2d308e/real-data/java
hasio.quarkus
asquarkus.platform.group-id
:Should that not be
io.quarkus.platform
by default @ia3andy ? This does seem to be the case if a codestart is invoked by the maven mojoio.quarkus.platform:quarkus-maven-plugin:2.13.4.Final:create
as well as asquarkus create app
so I think it would be nice if the project generated by the integration-tests was aligned with these.For that to happen
QuarkusCodestartTest.quarkusBomGroupId
could be adjusted here:quarkus/independent-projects/tools/devtools-testing/src/main/java/io/quarkus/devtools/testing/codestarts/QuarkusCodestartTest.java
Lines 108 to 110 in 402107d
Do you agree @ia3andy? Should I make this a pull request?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions