You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
List completed working groups in the working group page
Extend working group metadata to detect completed working groups.
Do not display completed working groups as cards.
Add a simple list at the bottom of the page.
short-description: Track the progress around the new TLS configuration centralization and new features (like Let's Encrypt, Cert-Manager, and local experience...)
@@ -9,6 +36,7 @@ working-groups:
9
36
<p>The goal of this focus group is to continue integrating the TLS registry and improve Quarkus integration with certificate providers (Let's Encrypt, Cert-Manager). In addition, we would like to provide a frictionless local experience around TLS (i.e., without the infamous untrusted certificate screen).</p>
10
37
<p><em>Point of contact:</em> @cescoffier (@<strong>Clement Escoffier</strong> on Zulip)</p>
11
38
status: complete
39
+
completed: true
12
40
last-activity: 2024-09-29
13
41
last-update: |
14
42
This working group is complete!
@@ -43,25 +71,10 @@ working-groups:
43
71
<p>When Quarkus has an active working governance model in place and all major work items around setting up Quarkus at CommonHaus are completed - after that, its expected things will just be iteratively improved, and the dedicated working group will not be needed (others might start to continue more specific efforts).</p>
44
72
<p>The majority of the work must be done before the end of December 2024. The latest deadline for CommonHaus is April 2025, when the bootstrap period of CommonHaus ends.</p>
short-description: The goal of this working group is to rewrite Quarkus's test classloading, so that tests are run in the same classloader as the application under tests, and Quarkus extensions can do "Quarkus-y" manipulations of test classes.
@@ -74,20 +87,12 @@ working-groups:
74
87
<p>A final benefit is a reduction in the internal complexity of our code. Hopping between classloaders during test execution takes a lot of work, and adds a lot of code! It also is brittle in places. For example, because the hop between classloaders relies on serialization in some cases, it's becoming harder to do as the JVM tightens up security restrictions. We used to rely on xstream, but that stopped working in Java 17. In https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/40601, @dmlloyd moved us to use the JBoss Serializer, which works better, but might still be affected by future restrictions on class access.</p>
75
88
<p>The goal of this working group is to allow test classes to fully participate in the 'quarkification' of classes. The mechanism for this is probably just to load the test classes with the classloader we intend to run them with, so that JUnit sees the 'correct' version of the class.</p>
76
89
status: on track
90
+
completed: false
77
91
last-activity: 2024-09-24
78
92
last-update: |
79
93
Since we don't have a target date, and progress is being made, I can declare this on track, with only a slightly murky conscience.
80
94
81
95
This is a big change, and one which doesn't lend itself well to dividing into smaller chunks. I'm keeping a spreadsheet of build results. In the CI runs, the number of failing jobs was 31 at the last update, and it is now 25. A number of suites, such as `integration-tests/devtools` were failing, and are now passing.
short-description: Allow Static Site Generation with Quarkus.
@@ -108,6 +113,7 @@ working-groups:
108
113
<p>This effort is now tracked using a "Working Group" project: https://github.com/orgs/quarkiverse/projects/6</p>
109
114
<p>This is a great opportunity to participate in fun effort and be involved with the Quarkus community, if anyone is interested in being a part of this, please reach out to me 🚀</p>
110
115
status: on track
116
+
completed: false
111
117
last-activity: 2024-09-23
112
118
last-update: |
113
119
0.0.3 has been released, it is the MVP version and allowed to publish the Roq blog: https://quarkiverse.io/quarkus-roq/posts/2024-08-29-welcome-to-roq/
@@ -133,6 +139,7 @@ working-groups:
133
139
Once completed, this working group will be followed by other initiatives focusing on generating the Github Action and Tekton pipelines.</p>
134
140
<p><em>Point of contact</em>: @iocanel (<code>Ioannis Canellos</code>on Zulip)</p>
135
141
status: on track
142
+
completed: false
136
143
last-activity: 2024-09-10
137
144
last-update: |
138
145
There is a first draft https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/42316
@@ -151,6 +158,7 @@ working-groups:
151
158
<p>Recently, we delivered a new approach to dealing with WebSocket (both for the server and client). This was the first step. There are still a few areas to improve, such as documentation, security, observability, and testability. The goal of this focus group is to track these efforts.</p>
152
159
<p>Point of contact: @mkouba (@<strong>Martin Kouba</strong> on Zulip)</p>
153
160
status: on track
161
+
completed: false
154
162
last-activity: 2024-09-05
155
163
last-update: |
156
164
The last outstanding issue is OTel integration. @michalvavrik is working on a [pull request](https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/41956). I will meet with Michal and Bruno in the coming weeks. The PR is quite massive and we need to review it carefully.
0 commit comments