Replies: 1 comment
-
I'm not sure the callouts where even designed to work this way as for instance they are not designed/implemented to be nested. I'll let @cscheid answer for this "feature request"-ish. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
With the "list-table" extension and proper indentation (as mentioned in #10924),
calloutscan be used in tables (great!). However, under certain circumstances the following error is issued:The solution of this error was provided by Ulrike Fischer in this post on stackexchange.
I've prepared the example below including the solution mentioned in the above linked post. Additionally, I've added some space before and after the
tcolorboxsince it was missing around thecalloutsin the table environment (before after skip balanced) .However, I'm basically duplicating the options passed to
tcolorboxby the defaultcalloutswhich I'd like to avoid.My question: Is there any chance you can implement the solution, e.g. offer an option for the default callouts when used in tables or -- even better -- change the options for
tcolorboxwhen thecalloutis detected in a table?If you run this example, you should encounter the above posted error for each
calloutin the table after you change the previous entry totable-callout-note(see also comments in the example).Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions