Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
If you don't want the default template or part of it, customise it using partials, see https://quarto.org/docs/journals/templates.html#template-partials. Additionally, take a look at the following Quarto extension: https://github.com/pandoc-ext/section-bibliographies. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK. Thanks --- I think it's fairly simple, but I have another question, if that's OK? It may also be trivial, but not sure, again, I'm missing an obvious problem... Say the
(NB: that's pretty much like I showed before, with some extra customisation of the fonts & colours in the sections as per here). All works OK (except the full reference list is also included by the default partials). Now, I can modify the
(basically I now include an extra However, in this case, the
I don't really understand why --- does this mean I would need to add other partials, even if all I want to modify is a simple bit in the Thanks & sorry if I'm being thick! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This will only works with Pandoc's citation processing, but here you are using Just wanted to give a quick explainer around this :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Understood! Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have a simple pdf document where I want to create a list of references, from a
bib
file. That's easy enough but I'd like to make full use ofbiblatex
and be able to divide the publications by type.For example, I can do
This works great (assumes of course that
mypubs.bib
andharvard.csl
are available...). BUT, in addition to printing the two separate lists of books and articles (as required by the two\printbibliography
commands), it also automatically generates at the end of the resulting pdf document a full list of references (by effect of thenocite: @*
command), which however I don't want --- that's the point of having it divided by types.I've tried adding a
suppress-bibliography: true
argument to theyaml
, but to no effect.Am I missing something obvious or is there an extra option hidden somewhere that I should use (say a
biblatex-type
or something argument to theyaml
?)Thanks
Gianluca
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions