How can I enable numbering for my figures for a reveal js presentation?

[Martin15135215]

Description

I look at here in the documentation:

• https://quarto.org/docs/reference/formats/presentations/revealjs.html#numbering
• https://quarto.org/docs/reference/formats/presentations/revealjs.html#figures

I only saw the option to add numbering for the section.

[mcanouil]

You need to make your figures as cross-reference.

[Martin15135215]

I used quarto convert Test.ipynb

````qmd
---
title: Test
author: Martin
date: '2023-12-01'
format:
  revealjs:
    theme: dark
    slide-number: true
    mermaid:
      theme: dark
    standalone: true
    execute:
      echo: true
jupyter: python3
---

## Mermaid

```{mermaid}
%%| echo: false
%%| label: fig-mermaid
%%| fig-cap: "Mermaid"
flowchart TD
    A[Christmas] -->|Get money| B(Go shopping)
    B --> C{Let me think}
    C -->|One| D[Laptop]
    C -->|Two| E[iPhone]
    C -->|Three| F[fa:fa-car Car]
```

## Picutre

![lorenzo-hamers-oPqdoLy0MDo-unsplash.jpg](attachment:0b822cde-8199-4f02-ad8d-a464bd555a30.jpg){#fig-picutre}
````

[mcanouil]

no need to have ````qmd, it was for the example or using more backticks.

[Martin15135215]

Use your favourite browser inspect mode and use CSS to modify components.
Also look at the documentation guide for revealjs which has everything regarding advanced theming.

Note that the difference of size is likely due to reactivity / auto scale/resize which is also described in the documentation.

I'm not familiar with HTML/CSS/Javasript...

[mcanouil]

Unfortunately, at some point if you don't want the default of HTML based format, you'll have to learn.
There never will be ways around that.

This being said, here it seems there is something fishy.
Could you open a new discussion with the example (but without the surrounding ````qmd)?

[Martin15135215]

I am pleased with the default dark theme. I found it just confusing why the fig caption size is inconsistent. Therefore, I thought this was not intended, more a bug.

Could you open a new discussion with the example (but without the surrounding ````qmd)?

See: #7763