authors (year) <doi:...> or authors (year, <doi:...>)

[delde001]

In the example references, you use the format authors (year) doi:... However, in the rcpp example people use authors (year, doi:...) ? What format should I use or are both ok?

[Baltmann01]

Preferably, use the authors (year) doi:... format, to keep things standardized. However, if that's the only issue of your package, I, at least, won't reject just because of the misplaced bracket. I will add a note if that's not the only thing that needs fixing and/or let you know that authors (year) doi:... would be preferred.

[hturner]

Maybe it would be better to use an example that uses the preferred format, to avoid confusion?

Perhaps this one: RcppThread.

Also, the CRAN review communication is clearer here that the cookbook solution. I suggest a minor update for clairfication:

Remove any space after `doi:` or `https:` in references (<doi:…> or <https:…>) to enable the link.

[delde001]

Indeed, the example confused me, the instructions are clear. Using a better example solves it ;-)

[Baltmann01]

PR #77 changes the example to the 'GA' description. Thanks for pointing that out @delde001