expect_success() and expect_failure() potentially misleading under multiple conditions #2110
Description
As observed in #1469:
expect_success({ expect(TRUE, '1'); expect(FALSE, '2') })
expect_failure({ expect(TRUE, '1'); expect(FALSE, '2') })Both of these pass, whereas I might expect both to fail.
This is strictly documented correctly:
check that there's at least one success or failure respectively.
But I wonder if that's the natural default behavior, especially with Hadley's comment that producing multiple "success" conditions is usually wrong.