Update cran-comments

Author: jennybc

cran-comments.md

@@ -1,9 +1,35 @@
-In case it comes up, the reverse dependency tidytuesdayR regularly fails when CRAN checks usethis, due to tidytuesdayR hitting a GitHub API rate limit in its tests. This is an expected false positive and has been seen on multiple previous successful usethis submissions.
+## R CMD check results
+
+0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 note
+
+Maintainer's email address is changing from [email protected] to [email protected].
 
 ## revdepcheck results
 
-We checked 153 reverse dependencies (152 from CRAN + 1 from Bioconductor), comparing R CMD check results across CRAN and dev versions of this package.
+We checked 178 reverse dependencies, comparing R CMD check results across CRAN and dev versions of this package.
+
+ * We saw 2 new problems
+ * We failed to check 0 packages
+
+Issues with CRAN packages are summarised below.
+
+### New problems
+
+* exampletestr
+  This package has been using usethis to create a path for a message that goes
+  through an intermediate stage where the path doesn't make sense.
+  Basically `/path/to/whatever` briefly becomes `/path/to/path/to/whatever`.
+  This worked in the past, because the path was then re-processed in a way that
+  cancelled out the mistake, i.e. `/path/to/path/to/whatever` was restored to
+  `/path/to/whatever`.
+  However, usethis now errors for nonsensical paths, like
+  `/path/to/path/to/whatever`.
+  We've made a pull request to eliminate the unnecessary maneuver.
+  This only affects a message, not the functionality of the package.
+  https://github.com/rorynolan/exampletestr/pull/12
 
- * We saw 0 new problems
- * We failed to check 1 package (animalcules, from Bioconductor)
+* fusen
+  This package was making use of an unexported function that has been removed.
+  We've made a pull request with a more robust way to achieve the intent:
+  https://github.com/ThinkR-open/fusen/pull/205