Replies: 4 comments
-
From your toot I opened the page on a not-full-width window and then added 900. I liked that. In full width a higher value is probably better. But can't you take a page from bootstrap etc and do something like '90% width as longer as device width is larger than x' with a common cutoff these frameworks use between mobile, tablet, browser? Good UI design is hard. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The builds, articles, and api pages look fine at any width, IMO, including the smallest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Decided to go with 1440 for the new front-end. This is the default resolution for the smallest (13-inch) macbook air M1, and also the width used by mozilla: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Content_categories |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Deployed part of the new front-end for universe pages and individual package homepages, for example: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently the r-universe dashboards use fluid-width, which might look weird on very large screens. Some people suggest we switch to a fixed max-width.
What makes this challenging is that the content of different universes varies a lot. A fixed width will apply across all packages and tabs, so we should try it with different packages and universes to make sure it is sufficiently wide for a variety of content.
Both are possible. Some examples:
I added a feature to experiment with fixed max-width. If you got to a universe homepage and press
w
on your keyboard you can enter a value to test how it looks with a given max-width.Some random pages to test :
Try a few values and suggest what you think looks nice.
13 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions